Interjurisdictional Competition, Land Finance Revenue, and Redistributive Expenditure of Local Governments in China

This study investigates redistributive spending in China’s governance system, focusing on fiscal decentralization, interjurisdictional competition, and land finance revenue. Using multilevel modeling of data from 283 prefectural cities and 2,862 county-level jurisdictions, it finds that interjurisdictional competition prioritizes developmental spending over redistributive services. No significant relationship is observed between fiscal capacity—measured by tax revenues or intergovernmental transfers—and redistributive expenditures. However, higher land finance revenues are positively linked to increased redistributive spending. The study attributes this development-oriented strategy to the cadre promotion system, where local officials advance their careers by achieving policy goals through competition for economic investments. By integrating land finance into the analysis of redistributive spending, this research highlights its implications for equity and sustainability. It underscores the urgent need for fiscal and social policy reforms to balance developmental priorities with equitable social welfare provision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Finance and Management
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15239721251330379
Primary Topic
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interjurisdictional Competition, Land Finance Revenue, and Redistributive Expenditure of Local Governments in China

Qingfang Wang, Zhang Ping, Chunrong Zheng, Huiping Li
Public Finance and Management
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
article

Interjurisdictional Competition, Land Finance Revenue, and Redistributive Expenditure of Local Governments in China

Qingfang Wang, Zhang Ping, Chunrong Zheng, Huiping Li
article en

Abstract

This study investigates redistributive spending in China’s governance system, focusing on fiscal decentralization, interjurisdictional competition, and land finance revenue. Using multilevel modeling of data from 283 prefectural cities and 2,862 county-level jurisdictions, it finds that interjurisdictional competition prioritizes developmental spending over redistributive services. No significant relationship is observed between fiscal capacity—measured by tax revenues or intergovernmental transfers—and redistributive expenditures. However, higher land finance revenues are positively linked to increased redistributive spending. The study attributes this development-oriented strategy to the cadre promotion system, where local officials advance their careers by achieving policy goals through competition for economic investments. By integrating land finance into the analysis of redistributive spending, this research highlights its implications for equity and sustainability. It underscores the urgent need for fiscal and social policy reforms to balance developmental priorities with equitable social welfare provision.

Public Finance and ManagementVol. 24(1-2)
University of California, Riverside (US), Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (CN), Fudan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Interjurisdictional Competition, Land Finance Revenue, and Redistributive Expenditure of Local Governments in China — Qingfang Wang, Zhang Ping, et al. · Public Finance and Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS