Economic Effects and EU State Aid Control: Recalibrating the Impact Standards for the Identification of Aid in Article 107(1) TFEU

Abstract Despite the frequent refrain that the identification of State aid depends on the effects of a measure and not is objectives, causes, or aims, the conditions for the application of the prohibition on aid that directly relate to the effects of an intervention play a relatively minor role in the analysis. These impact standards, which require that a measure causes a distortion of competition and affects trade between Member States, are easily satisfied. This article proposes changes to the application of these impact standards in Article 107(1) TFEU. It argues that the criteria relating to the distortion of competition and the effect on trade between Member States should be interpreted as distinct, higher thresholds imposing more substantial evidential burden on the Commission. This proposal draws on the existing logic of the case law and the State aid control regime to contain the notion of aid within principled and coherent limits.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Competition Law & Economics
Published
2025-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhaf012
Primary Topic
EU Law and Policy Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic Effects and EU State Aid Control: Recalibrating the Impact Standards for the Identification of Aid in Article 107(1) TFEU

Christopher McMahon
Journal of Competition Law & Economics
EU Law and Policy Analysis
article

Economic Effects and EU State Aid Control: Recalibrating the Impact Standards for the Identification of Aid in Article 107(1) TFEU

Christopher McMahon
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite the frequent refrain that the identification of State aid depends on the effects of a measure and not is objectives, causes, or aims, the conditions for the application of the prohibition on aid that directly relate to the effects of an intervention play a relatively minor role in the analysis. These impact standards, which require that a measure causes a distortion of competition and affects trade between Member States, are easily satisfied. This article proposes changes to the application of these impact standards in Article 107(1) TFEU. It argues that the criteria relating to the distortion of competition and the effect on trade between Member States should be interpreted as distinct, higher thresholds imposing more substantial evidential burden on the Commission. This proposal draws on the existing logic of the case law and the State aid control regime to contain the notion of aid within principled and coherent limits.

Journal of Competition Law & EconomicsVol. 21(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
EU Law and Policy Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Economic Effects and EU State Aid Control: Recalibrating the Impact Standards for the Identification of Aid in Article 107(1) TFEU — Christopher McMahon · Journal of Competition Law & Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS