Polar Life Pod Cooling Efficacy When Small Volumes of Water are Available to Treat Exercise-Induced Hyperthermia

IntroductionCold-water immersion is the standard of care for treating exertional heatstroke (EHS). The Polar Life Pod (PLP; Polar Products Inc, Stow, OH), a body-bag-like device, is a novel, portable cold-water immersion device with excellent cooling rates (>0.18°C·min<sup>-1</sup>) when 151 to 208 L of water are used to treat hyperthermia. Unfortunately, these water volumes are not always available to treat EHS (eg, wilderness firefighting). Little research has examined whether the PLP with small water volumes meets expert recommendations for acceptable (ie, 0.08-0.15°C·min<sup>-1</sup>) or ideal cooling rates (ie, >0.16°C·min<sup>-1</sup>).MethodsThirty-two subjects (20 males and 12 females aged 21±2 y with a mass of 72.2±11.0 kg and a height of 170.4±7.2 cm) were assigned to 1 of 4 groups in this matched-pairs laboratory study. Participants wore a uniform and 9.5-kg rucksack and marched in the heat (wet-bulb globe temperature=26.1±0.1°C) until their rectal temperature (<i>T</i><sub>REC</sub>) was 39.5°C. Then they removed the uniform and sat in the heat (0 L) or lay in a PLP filled with 19, 38, or 76 L of ∼8°C water until <i>T</i><sub>REC</sub> was 38°C.ResultsBy design, all groups had comparable physical characteristics: body fat percentage (<i>P</i>=0.39), lean body mass (<i>P</i>=0.86), fat mass (<i>P</i>=0.13), body surface area (<i>P</i>=0.36), body surface area-lean body mass ratio (<i>P</i>=0.98), and body mass index (<i>P</i>=0.63). Subjects exercised for similar durations (<i>P</i>=0.66), and pre-immersion water temperatures were consistent between groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). <i>T</i><sub>REC</sub> cooling rates differed (0 L=0.03±0.01°C·min<sup>-1</sup>, 19 L=0.13±0.08°C·min<sup>-1</sup>, 38 L=0.10±0.03°C·min<sup>-1</sup>, and 76 L=0.17±0.09°C·min<sup>-1</sup>; <i>P</i>=0.002). No cooling-rate differences occurred between 19, 38, and 76 L (<i>P</i><0.05).ConclusionPLP with 76 L met expert recommendations for ideal cooling rates; 19 and 38 L demonstrated acceptable cooling rates. PLP may help save lives from EHS when water access is limited.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wilderness and Environmental Medicine
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032251332282
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polar Life Pod Cooling Efficacy When Small Volumes of Water are Available to Treat Exercise-Induced Hyperthermia

Kevin C. Miller
1 citations
Wilderness and Environmental Medicine
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
1.16
article

Polar Life Pod Cooling Efficacy When Small Volumes of Water are Available to Treat Exercise-Induced Hyperthermia

Kevin C. Miller
article en
1 citations

Abstract

IntroductionCold-water immersion is the standard of care for treating exertional heatstroke (EHS). The Polar Life Pod (PLP; Polar Products Inc, Stow, OH), a body-bag-like device, is a novel, portable cold-water immersion device with excellent cooling rates (>0.18°C·min<sup>-1</sup>) when 151 to 208 L of water are used to treat hyperthermia. Unfortunately, these water volumes are not always available to treat EHS (eg, wilderness firefighting). Little research has examined whether the PLP with small water volumes meets expert recommendations for acceptable (ie, 0.08-0.15°C·min<sup>-1</sup>) or ideal cooling rates (ie, >0.16°C·min<sup>-1</sup>).MethodsThirty-two subjects (20 males and 12 females aged 21±2 y with a mass of 72.2±11.0 kg and a height of 170.4±7.2 cm) were assigned to 1 of 4 groups in this matched-pairs laboratory study. Participants wore a uniform and 9.5-kg rucksack and marched in the heat (wet-bulb globe temperature=26.1±0.1°C) until their rectal temperature (<i>T</i><sub>REC</sub>) was 39.5°C. Then they removed the uniform and sat in the heat (0 L) or lay in a PLP filled with 19, 38, or 76 L of ∼8°C water until <i>T</i><sub>REC</sub> was 38°C.ResultsBy design, all groups had comparable physical characteristics: body fat percentage (<i>P</i>=0.39), lean body mass (<i>P</i>=0.86), fat mass (<i>P</i>=0.13), body surface area (<i>P</i>=0.36), body surface area-lean body mass ratio (<i>P</i>=0.98), and body mass index (<i>P</i>=0.63). Subjects exercised for similar durations (<i>P</i>=0.66), and pre-immersion water temperatures were consistent between groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). <i>T</i><sub>REC</sub> cooling rates differed (0 L=0.03±0.01°C·min<sup>-1</sup>, 19 L=0.13±0.08°C·min<sup>-1</sup>, 38 L=0.10±0.03°C·min<sup>-1</sup>, and 76 L=0.17±0.09°C·min<sup>-1</sup>; <i>P</i>=0.002). No cooling-rate differences occurred between 19, 38, and 76 L (<i>P</i><0.05).ConclusionPLP with 76 L met expert recommendations for ideal cooling rates; 19 and 38 L demonstrated acceptable cooling rates. PLP may help save lives from EHS when water access is limited.

Wilderness and Environmental MedicineVol. 36(3)
Texas State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Thermoregulation and physiological responses
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.