Comparison of the clinical performance of pit and fissure sealants containing either fluoride or amorphous calcium phosphate on permanent first molars.

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical performance of 2 types of pit and fissure sealants--containing either fluoride or amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP)--over a period of 24 months. In this retrospective split-mouth study, 36 fluoride-containing sealants (Clinpro) and 36 ACP-containing sealants (Aegis) were evaluated 24 months after placement in the permanent first molars of 30 children aged 6 to 7 years. The sealants were inspected for retention based on the criteria of Oulis and Berdouses, with scores of 0, 1, and 2 representing total retention, partial loss, and total loss, respectively. In addition, the sealants were assigned scores for marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, and anatomical form based on the criteria of Feigal et al. Differences between groups in the occurrences of each evaluation variable were compared using relative risk with its 95% CI as well as the chi-square or Fisher exact test. The level of significance was set at P = 0.05. The retention success rates of the fluoride and ACP sealants after 24 months were 66.6% and 61.1%, respectively, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The overall clinical success of the fluoride-containing sealant was slightly greater than that of the ACP-containing sealant in terms of marginal discoloration and anatomical form; however, these differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The marginal integrity of the sealant with ACP nanofillers was greater than that of the fluoride-containing sealant, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05). After a 24-month follow-up period, no significant disparities in clinical performance were observed between fluoride- and ACP-containing sealants in terms of retention rates, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, or anatomical form. The clinical performance of both sealant types was found to be acceptable.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-04-21
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the clinical performance of pit and fissure sealants containing either fluoride or amorphous calcium phosphate on permanent first molars.

Mahtab Memarpour, Azade Rafiee, Alireza Sharifinejad, Niloofar Mokhtari
PubMed
Dental materials and restorations
article

Comparison of the clinical performance of pit and fissure sealants containing either fluoride or amorphous calcium phosphate on permanent first molars.

Mahtab Memarpour, Azade Rafiee, Alireza Sharifinejad, Niloofar Mokhtari
article en

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical performance of 2 types of pit and fissure sealants--containing either fluoride or amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP)--over a period of 24 months. In this retrospective split-mouth study, 36 fluoride-containing sealants (Clinpro) and 36 ACP-containing sealants (Aegis) were evaluated 24 months after placement in the permanent first molars of 30 children aged 6 to 7 years. The sealants were inspected for retention based on the criteria of Oulis and Berdouses, with scores of 0, 1, and 2 representing total retention, partial loss, and total loss, respectively. In addition, the sealants were assigned scores for marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, and anatomical form based on the criteria of Feigal et al. Differences between groups in the occurrences of each evaluation variable were compared using relative risk with its 95% CI as well as the chi-square or Fisher exact test. The level of significance was set at P = 0.05. The retention success rates of the fluoride and ACP sealants after 24 months were 66.6% and 61.1%, respectively, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The overall clinical success of the fluoride-containing sealant was slightly greater than that of the ACP-containing sealant in terms of marginal discoloration and anatomical form; however, these differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The marginal integrity of the sealant with ACP nanofillers was greater than that of the fluoride-containing sealant, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05). After a 24-month follow-up period, no significant disparities in clinical performance were observed between fluoride- and ACP-containing sealants in terms of retention rates, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, or anatomical form. The clinical performance of both sealant types was found to be acceptable.

PubMedVol. 73(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of the clinical performance of pit and fissure sealants containing either fluoride or amorphous calcium phosphate on permanent first molars. — Mahtab Memarpour, Azade Rafiee, et al. · PubMed (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS