Mechanical, workability, economic and environmental properties of concrete with limestone calcined clay cement and recycled aggregates

Limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) and recycled aggregates (RAs) are important innovations in civil engineering, offering solutions to the industry's energy and carbon challenges. However, limited research on their combined use has hindered widespread application. This study systematically evaluates LC3-based concrete with both coarse and fine RAs, using material testing, cost analysis and carbon footprint assessments to examine the effects of water-to-binder ratio, metakaolin-limestone powder synergy, RA content and particle quality on workability, compressive strength, elastic modulus, splitting-tensile strength, unit cost and environmental impact, while establishing clear quantitative relationships. Key findings include: (i) Using up to 50% metakaolin-limestone powder by mass, 30% coarse RA and 20% recycled sand by volume results in minimal reductions in 28-day strength and elastic modulus. However, exceeding 70%, 50% and 40%, respectively, leads to significant mechanical deterioration. (ii) LC3 concrete has 4-15% lower strength than Portland cement concrete at 14 days due to slower pozzolanic reactions, but strength levels equalize by 28 days. Similarly, recycled aggregate concrete shows lower early-age strength, with extended curing further highlighting performance differences, likely due to the residual mortar on recycled particles. (iii) Lifecycle analysis confirms that replacing 50% of the binder with metakaolin-limestone powder reduces carbon emissions by 29.9% and costs by 12.4% for strength-equivalent concrete. In contrast, RAs offer only modest sustainability benefits, with 20% recycled sand and 30% coarse RA increasing emissions by 5.4% and 2.8%, respectively, while keeping costs stable. (iv) The quality of RA particles plays a key role in their sustainable application. Additionally, transportation distance significantly affects the circular benefits of RA use but has a limited impact on the sustainability of metakaolin-limestone powder.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-97539-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanical, workability, economic and environmental properties of concrete with limestone calcined clay cement and recycled aggregates

Cheng Wan, Yong Yu, Min Yang, Lin Lang
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
1.01
article

Mechanical, workability, economic and environmental properties of concrete with limestone calcined clay cement and recycled aggregates

Cheng Wan, Yong Yu, Min Yang, Lin Lang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) and recycled aggregates (RAs) are important innovations in civil engineering, offering solutions to the industry's energy and carbon challenges. However, limited research on their combined use has hindered widespread application. This study systematically evaluates LC3-based concrete with both coarse and fine RAs, using material testing, cost analysis and carbon footprint assessments to examine the effects of water-to-binder ratio, metakaolin-limestone powder synergy, RA content and particle quality on workability, compressive strength, elastic modulus, splitting-tensile strength, unit cost and environmental impact, while establishing clear quantitative relationships. Key findings include: (i) Using up to 50% metakaolin-limestone powder by mass, 30% coarse RA and 20% recycled sand by volume results in minimal reductions in 28-day strength and elastic modulus. However, exceeding 70%, 50% and 40%, respectively, leads to significant mechanical deterioration. (ii) LC3 concrete has 4-15% lower strength than Portland cement concrete at 14 days due to slower pozzolanic reactions, but strength levels equalize by 28 days. Similarly, recycled aggregate concrete shows lower early-age strength, with extended curing further highlighting performance differences, likely due to the residual mortar on recycled particles. (iii) Lifecycle analysis confirms that replacing 50% of the binder with metakaolin-limestone powder reduces carbon emissions by 29.9% and costs by 12.4% for strength-equivalent concrete. In contrast, RAs offer only modest sustainability benefits, with 20% recycled sand and 30% coarse RA increasing emissions by 5.4% and 2.8%, respectively, while keeping costs stable. (iv) The quality of RA particles plays a key role in their sustainable application. Additionally, transportation distance significantly affects the circular benefits of RA use but has a limited impact on the sustainability of metakaolin-limestone powder.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Jiujiang University (CN), Guangzhou Maritime College (CN), South China University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Education Department of Jiangxi Province
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.