A comprehensive survey of specularity detection: state-of-the-art techniques and breakthroughs

Specularity poses significant challenges in computer vision (CV), often leading to performance degradation in various tasks. Despite its importance, the CV field lacks a comprehensive review of specularity detection techniques. This survey addresses this gap by synthesizing diverse definitions of specularity and providing a unified framework to enhance consistency. It also presents a systematic review of traditional and deep learning-based methods for detecting specularity. Comparative experiments on a standardized dataset enable in-depth evaluation of each method, highlighting their strengths and limitations. The survey further provides structured insights and guidance for selecting appropriate methods across diverse scenarios. Through this, it identifies key areas for future research, aiming to support the development of more advanced detection models. By integrating diverse methodologies and quantitative analyzes, this survey contributes to a deeper understanding of current advancements and potential innovations in specularity detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11233-7
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comprehensive survey of specularity detection: state-of-the-art techniques and breakthroughs

Fengze Li, Hai‐Ning Liang, Tianxi Wen, Zhongbei Tian et al.
5 citations
Artificial Intelligence Review
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
12.40
article

A comprehensive survey of specularity detection: state-of-the-art techniques and breakthroughs

Fengze Li, Hai‐Ning Liang, Tianxi Wen, Zhongbei Tian, Dawei Liu, Jieming Ma, Zhijing Wu
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Specularity poses significant challenges in computer vision (CV), often leading to performance degradation in various tasks. Despite its importance, the CV field lacks a comprehensive review of specularity detection techniques. This survey addresses this gap by synthesizing diverse definitions of specularity and providing a unified framework to enhance consistency. It also presents a systematic review of traditional and deep learning-based methods for detecting specularity. Comparative experiments on a standardized dataset enable in-depth evaluation of each method, highlighting their strengths and limitations. The survey further provides structured insights and guidance for selecting appropriate methods across diverse scenarios. Through this, it identifies key areas for future research, aiming to support the development of more advanced detection models. By integrating diverse methodologies and quantitative analyzes, this survey contributes to a deeper understanding of current advancements and potential innovations in specularity detection.

Artificial Intelligence ReviewVol. 58(7)
University of Liverpool (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), University College London (GB), Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN), University of Birmingham (GB), University of Hong Kong (HK), South China University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
12.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comprehensive survey of specularity detection: state-of-the-art techniques and breakthroughs — Fengze Li, Hai‐Ning Liang, et al. · Artificial Intelligence Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS