A combined model method was used to identify the main influencing factors of soil heavy metal pollution sources in Qian river, China

The issue of soil heavy metal contamination has garnered significant global attention, with the identification of heavy metal sources and their driving factors being crucial for the prevention and management of soil heavy metal pollution. This study introduces a comprehensive source-driver model integrating the Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) model, Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR), and Geo-detector Model (GDM). Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) was employed to quantify the concentrations of eight heavy metals in the soils of the lower reaches of the Qian River. The findings revealed that: (1) The average concentrations of the 8 heavy metals did not exceed the risk screening thresholds for soil environmental quality. Specifically, the mean concentrations of Ni, Zn, As, and Cd were 42.16, 102.07, 18.23, and 0.32 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>, respectively, which are 1.46, 1.47, 3.7, and 6.17 times higher than the background values for soil in Shaanxi Province, with Cd exhibiting a coefficient of variation of 0.58. This high degree of variation is attributed to anthropogenic activities. Spatially, each heavy metal was more heavily concentrated in the southeastern and northwestern regions of the study area. (2) The results of PMF model showed that soil heavy metals in the study area mainly came from nature, industry, agriculture, and traffic, and the contribution of each source was 19.12%, 23.42%, 36.85% and 20.61%. Notably, agricultural sources emerged as the predominant contributors to soil pollution in the region. (3) GDM and GWR results showed that distance from village, soil type and elevation were the main drivers of soil heavy metal pollution sources in the study area. This study provides a reference for the analysis of soil heavy metal sources, and the results can provide a theoretical basis for the prevention and control of soil heavy metal pollution in the study area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98881-5
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Heavy metals in environment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A combined model method was used to identify the main influencing factors of soil heavy metal pollution sources in Qian river, China

Zihua Wang, Yani Geng, Leiyu Liu, Jun Zhang et al.
3 citations
Scientific Reports
Heavy metals in environment
1.51
article

A combined model method was used to identify the main influencing factors of soil heavy metal pollution sources in Qian river, China

Zihua Wang, Yani Geng, Leiyu Liu, Jun Zhang, Yuru Li
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The issue of soil heavy metal contamination has garnered significant global attention, with the identification of heavy metal sources and their driving factors being crucial for the prevention and management of soil heavy metal pollution. This study introduces a comprehensive source-driver model integrating the Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) model, Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR), and Geo-detector Model (GDM). Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) was employed to quantify the concentrations of eight heavy metals in the soils of the lower reaches of the Qian River. The findings revealed that: (1) The average concentrations of the 8 heavy metals did not exceed the risk screening thresholds for soil environmental quality. Specifically, the mean concentrations of Ni, Zn, As, and Cd were 42.16, 102.07, 18.23, and 0.32 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>, respectively, which are 1.46, 1.47, 3.7, and 6.17 times higher than the background values for soil in Shaanxi Province, with Cd exhibiting a coefficient of variation of 0.58. This high degree of variation is attributed to anthropogenic activities. Spatially, each heavy metal was more heavily concentrated in the southeastern and northwestern regions of the study area. (2) The results of PMF model showed that soil heavy metals in the study area mainly came from nature, industry, agriculture, and traffic, and the contribution of each source was 19.12%, 23.42%, 36.85% and 20.61%. Notably, agricultural sources emerged as the predominant contributors to soil pollution in the region. (3) GDM and GWR results showed that distance from village, soil type and elevation were the main drivers of soil heavy metal pollution sources in the study area. This study provides a reference for the analysis of soil heavy metal sources, and the results can provide a theoretical basis for the prevention and control of soil heavy metal pollution in the study area.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Chang'an University (CN), Baoji University of Arts and Sciences (CN), Ministry of Education (BD)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Baoji University of Arts And Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Heavy metals in environment
1.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.