Professionals, Homemakers, and Moral Witnesses: Resource Mobilization in the Movement against Nuclear Weapons

In this article, I explore how activists have sustained the movement against nuclear weapons in spite of persistent funding challenges. Using publicly available grant information, I demonstrate that foundation funding has typically come only after windows of opportunity had already opened—and activist campaigns were well underway. Next, I explore how activists drew on their personal resources to mobilize during three key moments: the scientists’ campaign, the test ban campaign, and the nuclear freeze campaign. Drawing on scholarly accounts of the movement, I divide these activists into three categories—professionals, homemakers, and moral witnesses—and sketch how each contributed to the movement against nuclear weapons. In light of this history, I draw two conclusions. First, I argue that more reliable funding would allow activists to respond to fleeting windows of opportunity more effectively and efficiently. Second, I suggest that the movement’s reliance on the personal resources of activists has allowed it to survive, but at the expense of building a diverse coalition in support of disarmament.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Behavioral Scientist
Published
2025-04-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642251331685
Primary Topic
Nuclear Issues and Defense
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Professionals, Homemakers, and Moral Witnesses: Resource Mobilization in the Movement against Nuclear Weapons

Alex Maresca
American Behavioral Scientist
Nuclear Issues and Defense
article

Professionals, Homemakers, and Moral Witnesses: Resource Mobilization in the Movement against Nuclear Weapons

Alex Maresca
article en

Abstract

In this article, I explore how activists have sustained the movement against nuclear weapons in spite of persistent funding challenges. Using publicly available grant information, I demonstrate that foundation funding has typically come only after windows of opportunity had already opened—and activist campaigns were well underway. Next, I explore how activists drew on their personal resources to mobilize during three key moments: the scientists’ campaign, the test ban campaign, and the nuclear freeze campaign. Drawing on scholarly accounts of the movement, I divide these activists into three categories—professionals, homemakers, and moral witnesses—and sketch how each contributed to the movement against nuclear weapons. In light of this history, I draw two conclusions. First, I argue that more reliable funding would allow activists to respond to fleeting windows of opportunity more effectively and efficiently. Second, I suggest that the movement’s reliance on the personal resources of activists has allowed it to survive, but at the expense of building a diverse coalition in support of disarmament.

American Behavioral Scientist
Film Independent (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Nuclear Issues and Defense
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Professionals, Homemakers, and Moral Witnesses: Resource Mobilization in the Movement against Nuclear Weapons — Alex Maresca · American Behavioral Scientist (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS