Redefining Purpose: The Effect of the 2019 Business Roundtable Statement on Corporate Tax Strategies

ABSTRACT Business Roundtable (BRT) firms have faced intense scrutiny from investors, media, and the public following their 2019 “Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation,” which marked a shift from shareholder‐centric governance to a stakeholder‐focused approach. This shift has sparked debate over whether BRT firms are genuinely committed to social responsibility or merely using it as a branding strategy without implementing meaningful changes. This paper contributes to the debate by empirically examining a key dimension of social responsibility—corporate tax behavior. Using a difference‐in‐difference analysis covering 2004–2022, we find that BRT firms engage in higher levels of tax avoidance than other publicly listed U.S. firms. More importantly, our results indicate that BRT firms have not significantly adjusted their tax behavior since the 2019 Statement, suggesting a disconnect between their stated commitment and actual practices. Our findings provide new insights into the social responsibility of BRT firms and contribute to the broader literature on the relationship between corporate tax avoidance and CSR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12804
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Redefining Purpose: The Effect of the 2019 Business Roundtable Statement on Corporate Tax Strategies

Omrane Guedhami, Sadok El Ghoul, Rana Jamshed
3 citations
Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
11.73
article

Redefining Purpose: The Effect of the 2019 Business Roundtable Statement on Corporate Tax Strategies

Omrane Guedhami, Sadok El Ghoul, Rana Jamshed
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Business Roundtable (BRT) firms have faced intense scrutiny from investors, media, and the public following their 2019 “Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation,” which marked a shift from shareholder‐centric governance to a stakeholder‐focused approach. This shift has sparked debate over whether BRT firms are genuinely committed to social responsibility or merely using it as a branding strategy without implementing meaningful changes. This paper contributes to the debate by empirically examining a key dimension of social responsibility—corporate tax behavior. Using a difference‐in‐difference analysis covering 2004–2022, we find that BRT firms engage in higher levels of tax avoidance than other publicly listed U.S. firms. More importantly, our results indicate that BRT firms have not significantly adjusted their tax behavior since the 2019 Statement, suggesting a disconnect between their stated commitment and actual practices. Our findings provide new insights into the social responsibility of BRT firms and contribute to the broader literature on the relationship between corporate tax avoidance and CSR.

Business Ethics the Environment & ResponsibilityVol. 35(2)
University of Alberta (CA), University of South Carolina (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
11.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Redefining Purpose: The Effect of the 2019 Business Roundtable Statement on Corporate Tax Strategies — Omrane Guedhami, Sadok El Ghoul, et al. · Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS