Experimental and simulating investigation of flexural behavior of geopolymer coral aggregate concrete beam reinforced with stainless steel rebar

Abstract Using geopolymer and coral aggregates in concrete preparation not only significantly reduces the economic and time costs associated with transporting construction materials for island projects, but also lowers carbon emissions and enhances resistance to sulfate ion erosion in seawater. Simultaneously, stainless steel rebar effectively safeguards against the corrosion of steel bars induced by chloride ions in marine environments. In practical engineering, reinforced concrete members frequently undergo flexural loading. Therefore, in this study, six geopolymer coral aggregate concrete beams (GCACB) with different reinforcement ratios were prepared and subjected to the four‐point bending test. Firstly, the flexural behavior of these beams was analyzed, including the failure pattern, load–deflection curve, concrete strain, ductility, toughness, and cracking moment. Subsequently, the constitutive relationship for geopolymer coral aggregate concrete (GCAC) and stainless steel rebar was obtained through experimental tests, respectively. The equivalent rectangular section coefficients were derived, and the ultimate moment was calculated based on the GCAC compression constitutive relationship. Finally, a finite element (FE) model of GCACB comprising detailed material and geometric modeling is developed utilizing Abaqus. The results indicate that cracks of GCAC initially appear in the aggregate. The cracking moment of the beams was calculated following three design codes, and it closely correlated with the experimental results. The FE model effectively replicates the failure pattern and crack propagation observed in the specimen beam test. The discrepancies in ultimate load, maximum displacement, and initial stiffness are all within the ranges of 15%, 10%, and 10%, respectively, affirming that the model analysis results align well with the experimental findings. In addition, simulation tests were extended to various types of concrete beams to assess the material properties of GCAC. The comparison reveals that the bending performance of GCACB closely resembles that of ordinary concrete‐stainless steel rebar beams, suggesting its potential for practical engineering applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Concrete
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.70111
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental and simulating investigation of flexural behavior of geopolymer coral aggregate concrete beam reinforced with stainless steel rebar

Haifeng Yang, Yi Jiang, Fukun Li, Minghui Li et al.
2 citations
Structural Concrete
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
1.91
article

Experimental and simulating investigation of flexural behavior of geopolymer coral aggregate concrete beam reinforced with stainless steel rebar

Haifeng Yang, Yi Jiang, Fukun Li, Minghui Li, Qingmei Yang, Jiasheng Jiang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Using geopolymer and coral aggregates in concrete preparation not only significantly reduces the economic and time costs associated with transporting construction materials for island projects, but also lowers carbon emissions and enhances resistance to sulfate ion erosion in seawater. Simultaneously, stainless steel rebar effectively safeguards against the corrosion of steel bars induced by chloride ions in marine environments. In practical engineering, reinforced concrete members frequently undergo flexural loading. Therefore, in this study, six geopolymer coral aggregate concrete beams (GCACB) with different reinforcement ratios were prepared and subjected to the four‐point bending test. Firstly, the flexural behavior of these beams was analyzed, including the failure pattern, load–deflection curve, concrete strain, ductility, toughness, and cracking moment. Subsequently, the constitutive relationship for geopolymer coral aggregate concrete (GCAC) and stainless steel rebar was obtained through experimental tests, respectively. The equivalent rectangular section coefficients were derived, and the ultimate moment was calculated based on the GCAC compression constitutive relationship. Finally, a finite element (FE) model of GCACB comprising detailed material and geometric modeling is developed utilizing Abaqus. The results indicate that cracks of GCAC initially appear in the aggregate. The cracking moment of the beams was calculated following three design codes, and it closely correlated with the experimental results. The FE model effectively replicates the failure pattern and crack propagation observed in the specimen beam test. The discrepancies in ultimate load, maximum displacement, and initial stiffness are all within the ranges of 15%, 10%, and 10%, respectively, affirming that the model analysis results align well with the experimental findings. In addition, simulation tests were extended to various types of concrete beams to assess the material properties of GCAC. The comparison reveals that the bending performance of GCACB closely resembles that of ordinary concrete‐stainless steel rebar beams, suggesting its potential for practical engineering applications.

Structural ConcreteVol. 26(3)
Tongji University (CN), Guangxi University (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.