The Government of India Act 1935: The Construction of Indian Women as ‘Minority’

There are several scholarly works devoted to the Government of India Act 1935, enabling us to identify specific influences behind particular clauses of the aforesaid Act. Unfortunately, there is no scholarly exposure as to what made the British Raj construct Indian women as a ‘special constituency’ and placed them alongside a potpourri of ‘special’ constituencies, designed to balance out antagonistic elements in the Indian body polity. Going by the logic that ‘labour’ counterweighed ‘landholders’, communal constituencies, namely, ‘Muslims’, ‘Scheduled Castes’, ‘Indian Christians’, ‘Anglo Indians’ and ‘Europeans’, counterweighed the Hindu majority, it escapes comprehension why Indian women should be conceptualised as a political counterweight to Indian men. The idea of women as minority was a racist constitutional innovation unknown in the Anglo-American world. This episode has received scant attention from scholars, a lacuna this article hopes to fill by discussing how and why Clause 10(b) or the ‘monogamy clause’ was inserted into the fine print of the Sixth Schedule of the Act by Eleanor Rathbone, Chaim Weizmann’s bosom friend and protégé, setting aside the vehement objections and representations of all Indian delegates present at the Round Table Conference in a case of British Might crushing the colonial Indian’s Rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Historical Review
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03769836251334008
Primary Topic
Legal and cultural studies analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Government of India Act 1935: The Construction of Indian Women as ‘Minority’

Nivedita Das
Indian Historical Review
Legal and cultural studies analysis
article

The Government of India Act 1935: The Construction of Indian Women as ‘Minority’

Nivedita Das
article en

Abstract

There are several scholarly works devoted to the Government of India Act 1935, enabling us to identify specific influences behind particular clauses of the aforesaid Act. Unfortunately, there is no scholarly exposure as to what made the British Raj construct Indian women as a ‘special constituency’ and placed them alongside a potpourri of ‘special’ constituencies, designed to balance out antagonistic elements in the Indian body polity. Going by the logic that ‘labour’ counterweighed ‘landholders’, communal constituencies, namely, ‘Muslims’, ‘Scheduled Castes’, ‘Indian Christians’, ‘Anglo Indians’ and ‘Europeans’, counterweighed the Hindu majority, it escapes comprehension why Indian women should be conceptualised as a political counterweight to Indian men. The idea of women as minority was a racist constitutional innovation unknown in the Anglo-American world. This episode has received scant attention from scholars, a lacuna this article hopes to fill by discussing how and why Clause 10(b) or the ‘monogamy clause’ was inserted into the fine print of the Sixth Schedule of the Act by Eleanor Rathbone, Chaim Weizmann’s bosom friend and protégé, setting aside the vehement objections and representations of all Indian delegates present at the Round Table Conference in a case of British Might crushing the colonial Indian’s Rights.

Indian Historical ReviewVol. 52(1)
University of Calcutta (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Legal and cultural studies analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.