Simulating Argo float trajectories and along-track physical and biogeochemical variability in the California Current System

Trajectories of >1,600 virtual Argo profiling floats and their sampled variability in key ocean physical and biogeochemical variables are simulated using a 0.125° global ocean physical-biogeochemical model (NOAA GFDL’s MOM6-SIS2-COBALTv2) and an offline Lagrangian particle tracking algorithm. Virtual floats are deployed at 92 locations within 26-50°N, 114-132°W in the California Current System (CCS) during the summers and winters of 2008-2012 with varying sampling strategies adopted (e.g., floats are set to park and drift at different depths, and to profile at different intervals). The overall direction and spatial spreads of simulated float trajectories depend on the latitudes of deployment locations with the largest area and variability sampled by floats deployed in the central CCS. Floats drifting at shallower depths (200 m and 500 m) tend to sample larger variability associated with larger sampled area, while those drifting at 1000 m show the strongest association with eddy-like ocean features. Sensitivity experiments with varying sampling intervals suggest that spatiotemporal variability in float observables are adequately sampled with a typical 5-day or 10-day interval. Furthermore, simulated float trajectories and sampled variability are compared against 3 real float trajectories and along-track observations. Results suggest that the fidelity of both our model simulations and the prevalent Argo float sampling design are generally satisfactory in characterizing interior ocean biogeochemical variability. This study provides new insights to inform optimal float deployment planning, sampling strategies, and data interpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Marine Science
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1481761
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulating Argo float trajectories and along-track physical and biogeochemical variability in the California Current System

Elizabeth J. Drenkard, Xiao Liu, John P. Dunne, Gregory C. Johnson
1 citations
Frontiers in Marine Science
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
1.79
article

Simulating Argo float trajectories and along-track physical and biogeochemical variability in the California Current System

Elizabeth J. Drenkard, Xiao Liu, John P. Dunne, Gregory C. Johnson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Trajectories of >1,600 virtual Argo profiling floats and their sampled variability in key ocean physical and biogeochemical variables are simulated using a 0.125° global ocean physical-biogeochemical model (NOAA GFDL’s MOM6-SIS2-COBALTv2) and an offline Lagrangian particle tracking algorithm. Virtual floats are deployed at 92 locations within 26-50°N, 114-132°W in the California Current System (CCS) during the summers and winters of 2008-2012 with varying sampling strategies adopted (e.g., floats are set to park and drift at different depths, and to profile at different intervals). The overall direction and spatial spreads of simulated float trajectories depend on the latitudes of deployment locations with the largest area and variability sampled by floats deployed in the central CCS. Floats drifting at shallower depths (200 m and 500 m) tend to sample larger variability associated with larger sampled area, while those drifting at 1000 m show the strongest association with eddy-like ocean features. Sensitivity experiments with varying sampling intervals suggest that spatiotemporal variability in float observables are adequately sampled with a typical 5-day or 10-day interval. Furthermore, simulated float trajectories and sampled variability are compared against 3 real float trajectories and along-track observations. Results suggest that the fidelity of both our model simulations and the prevalent Argo float sampling design are generally satisfactory in characterizing interior ocean biogeochemical variability. This study provides new insights to inform optimal float deployment planning, sampling strategies, and data interpretation.

Frontiers in Marine ScienceVol. 12
NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (US), Princeton University (US), NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (US), NOAA Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (US)
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.