Assessing Urban-Rural Income Disparities in the USA: A Data-Driven Approach Using Predictive Analytics

Income inequality in the US is a major quagmire that requires a multifaceted understanding of the difference between urban and rural regions. This study seeks to utilize predictive analytics and machine learning methodologies to help analyze these disparities in a thorough manner. The principal objective of this research was to design machine learning models that classify and analyze the urban-rural gap in income by employing a blend of demographic, geographic, and economic variables. The data for measuring urban-rural income inequality in the USA has been carefully pieced together from a range of trusted sources for broad coverage and reliability. The U.S. Census Bureau provides critical demographic and economic data through the American Community Survey (ACS), which offers nuanced detail on income, education, and work by geographic location. For the analysis of socioeconomic data in this study, three different models were chosen based on their individual strengths and appropriateness for the task of classification. To thoroughly analyze the performance of each of these models, a set of evaluation metrics was used that includes accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC. XG-Boost has the highest accuracy, followed by Logistic Regression. The SVM model has a slightly lower accuracy. From the comparison, one sees that both Logistic Regression and XG-Boost perform significantly better than SVM in classifying the dataset, while SVM, although the least accurate, still has a robust performance. Combining machine learning with social science holds tremendous promise for creating evidence-based policy suggestions that target socioeconomic inequalities in the USA. Using the predictive strength of machine learning algorithms, researchers have the ability to study large sets of datasets and reveal patterns and insights that may escape other methodologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ecohumanism
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i4.6733
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Urban-Rural Income Disparities in the USA: A Data-Driven Approach Using Predictive Analytics

Md. Abu Kawsar, Rifah Tasnia, Mohammad Iqbal Hossain, Md. Zaved Hossain Khan et al.
1 citations
Journal of Ecohumanism
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
4.20
article

Assessing Urban-Rural Income Disparities in the USA: A Data-Driven Approach Using Predictive Analytics

Md. Abu Kawsar, Rifah Tasnia, Mohammad Iqbal Hossain, Md. Zaved Hossain Khan, Babul Chandra Sarker, Afrin Hoque Jui, Md Abubokor Siam, Nudrat Fariha, MD Zulkernain Doha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Income inequality in the US is a major quagmire that requires a multifaceted understanding of the difference between urban and rural regions. This study seeks to utilize predictive analytics and machine learning methodologies to help analyze these disparities in a thorough manner. The principal objective of this research was to design machine learning models that classify and analyze the urban-rural gap in income by employing a blend of demographic, geographic, and economic variables. The data for measuring urban-rural income inequality in the USA has been carefully pieced together from a range of trusted sources for broad coverage and reliability. The U.S. Census Bureau provides critical demographic and economic data through the American Community Survey (ACS), which offers nuanced detail on income, education, and work by geographic location. For the analysis of socioeconomic data in this study, three different models were chosen based on their individual strengths and appropriateness for the task of classification. To thoroughly analyze the performance of each of these models, a set of evaluation metrics was used that includes accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC. XG-Boost has the highest accuracy, followed by Logistic Regression. The SVM model has a slightly lower accuracy. From the comparison, one sees that both Logistic Regression and XG-Boost perform significantly better than SVM in classifying the dataset, while SVM, although the least accurate, still has a robust performance. Combining machine learning with social science holds tremendous promise for creating evidence-based policy suggestions that target socioeconomic inequalities in the USA. Using the predictive strength of machine learning algorithms, researchers have the ability to study large sets of datasets and reveal patterns and insights that may escape other methodologies.

Journal of EcohumanismVol. 4(4)
University of Bridgeport (US), Trine University (US), Duquesne University (US), Grand Canyon University (US), Monterey Bay Aquarium Foundation (US), Gannon University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.