Light at the End of the Funnel: Taxonomic Biases of Aquatic Trapping Methods for Studying Wetland-Breeding Amphibians at Variable Depths

Aquatic funnel traps and light lures are widely used for surveying amphibians in wetlands, but researchers must select among various trap designs and configurations for any particular study. We examine the performance of glow sticks and four types of aquatic funnel traps, including three commercial minnows and a handcrafted, deep-water trap, on surveying wetland-breeding amphibians, including the Blue-spotted Salamander complex (Ambystoma laterale and Unisexual Ambystoma), Spotted Salamanders (A. maculatum), and Wood Frogs (Lithobates sylvaticus) in central Maine. We performed this study from April–May 2023 and 2024 in 15 freshwater wetlands, which were trapped with the four types of traps crossed with two light treatments (i.e., glow stick present or absent) for a total of eight treatment combinations. We deployed 1–3 replicates of each combination every night for 1–3 nights at each site, yielding 633 total trap nights. We used linear and generalized linear mixed models to compare capture probabilities, counts, and body size (snout-vent-length and mass) of amphibians among trapping methods. Trap designs exhibited taxonomic biases, with the Blue-spotted complex (mostly unisexual females) displaying greater captures in deep-water traps than commercial minnows, Spotted Salamanders displaying equivalent captures in all trap types, and Wood Frogs displaying fewer captures in deep-water traps than commercial minnows. Glow sticks boosted capture probabilities and counts of spotted salamanders, weakly improved capture probabilities for the Blue-spotted complex, and, in contrast to previous studies, had no effect on Wood Frogs. Trapping methods exhibited weak morphological biases for Spotted Salamanders, which were longer and heavier in deep-water traps and shorter and lighter in traps with glow sticks. Captures declined for all species over the season and with successive trap nights, highlighting an important consideration for optimizing landscape-scale studies for cryptic species. Future research examining sex and species-specific activity patterns at different depths and light spectra may address remaining uncertainties of aquatic trapping protocols for different amphibians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Herpetology
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1670/2460810
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Light at the End of the Funnel: Taxonomic Biases of Aquatic Trapping Methods for Studying Wetland-Breeding Amphibians at Variable Depths

Harrison Goldspiel, Noah Charney, Kristine Hoffmann
Journal of Herpetology
Species Distribution and Climate Change
article

Light at the End of the Funnel: Taxonomic Biases of Aquatic Trapping Methods for Studying Wetland-Breeding Amphibians at Variable Depths

Harrison Goldspiel, Noah Charney, Kristine Hoffmann
article en

Abstract

Aquatic funnel traps and light lures are widely used for surveying amphibians in wetlands, but researchers must select among various trap designs and configurations for any particular study. We examine the performance of glow sticks and four types of aquatic funnel traps, including three commercial minnows and a handcrafted, deep-water trap, on surveying wetland-breeding amphibians, including the Blue-spotted Salamander complex (Ambystoma laterale and Unisexual Ambystoma), Spotted Salamanders (A. maculatum), and Wood Frogs (Lithobates sylvaticus) in central Maine. We performed this study from April–May 2023 and 2024 in 15 freshwater wetlands, which were trapped with the four types of traps crossed with two light treatments (i.e., glow stick present or absent) for a total of eight treatment combinations. We deployed 1–3 replicates of each combination every night for 1–3 nights at each site, yielding 633 total trap nights. We used linear and generalized linear mixed models to compare capture probabilities, counts, and body size (snout-vent-length and mass) of amphibians among trapping methods. Trap designs exhibited taxonomic biases, with the Blue-spotted complex (mostly unisexual females) displaying greater captures in deep-water traps than commercial minnows, Spotted Salamanders displaying equivalent captures in all trap types, and Wood Frogs displaying fewer captures in deep-water traps than commercial minnows. Glow sticks boosted capture probabilities and counts of spotted salamanders, weakly improved capture probabilities for the Blue-spotted complex, and, in contrast to previous studies, had no effect on Wood Frogs. Trapping methods exhibited weak morphological biases for Spotted Salamanders, which were longer and heavier in deep-water traps and shorter and lighter in traps with glow sticks. Captures declined for all species over the season and with successive trap nights, highlighting an important consideration for optimizing landscape-scale studies for cryptic species. Future research examining sex and species-specific activity patterns at different depths and light spectra may address remaining uncertainties of aquatic trapping protocols for different amphibians.

Journal of HerpetologyVol. 59(1)
St. Lawrence University (US), Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife (US), University of Maine (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.