A Commentary on Choudhury and Maupin (2025): Revisiting the Downsides of Shared Leadership From a Multilevel and Resource-Oriented Perspective

Choudhury and Maupin (2025) present a framework that highlights the downsides of shared leadership for individual team members (e.g., higher demands, increased burnout). While their framework has the potential to add value to the positively skewed conversation on shared leadership, their theorizing appears selective and overlooks established theoretical and empirical work in the field. This commentary identifies three conceptual issues that warrant reconsideration: (1) the neglect of the multilevel nature of shared leadership, (2) the overlooked role of shared leadership as a team resource, and (3) the omission of formal leadership. To address these limitations, the commentary offers corresponding recommendations to strengthen and extend the framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Group & Organization Management
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011251337521
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Commentary on Choudhury and Maupin (2025): Revisiting the Downsides of Shared Leadership From a Multilevel and Resource-Oriented Perspective

Joyce Elena Schleu, Karolina W. Nieberle, Amelie V. Güntner, Kai N. Klasmeier
1 citations
Group & Organization Management
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
2.76
article

A Commentary on Choudhury and Maupin (2025): Revisiting the Downsides of Shared Leadership From a Multilevel and Resource-Oriented Perspective

Joyce Elena Schleu, Karolina W. Nieberle, Amelie V. Güntner, Kai N. Klasmeier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Choudhury and Maupin (2025) present a framework that highlights the downsides of shared leadership for individual team members (e.g., higher demands, increased burnout). While their framework has the potential to add value to the positively skewed conversation on shared leadership, their theorizing appears selective and overlooks established theoretical and empirical work in the field. This commentary identifies three conceptual issues that warrant reconsideration: (1) the neglect of the multilevel nature of shared leadership, (2) the overlooked role of shared leadership as a team resource, and (3) the omission of formal leadership. To address these limitations, the commentary offers corresponding recommendations to strengthen and extend the framework.

Group & Organization Management
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Universität Hamburg (DE), Durham University (GB), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH), Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.