Abstract 1127: Differences in the clinical and genomic landscape in young onset (YO) gastroesophageal cancer (GEC): an analysis from AACR Project GENIE

Abstract Background: Although GEC is most common in the elderly population, there is a rising incidence of YO GEC defined as occurring in patients ≤50 years of age. The clinical and genomic differences between YO and older onset disease remain unclear. We aim to comprehensively explore the clinical and genomic landscape of YO GEC and compare with older onset disease (>50 years) to elucidate potential molecular differences between the two age groups that may guide therapeutic approaches in the future. Methods: Data from the Association for Cancer Research Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (AACR-GENIE) registry (version 16.1 for somatic mutation analysis and version 13.1 for survival analysis) to study patients diagnosed with GEC was queried. Patients with GEC were stratified by age at time of tumor sequencing. cBioPortal was used to analyze the differences in genetic mutation frequencies and differences were examined using chi-squared test. Overall survival (OS) between the groups was calculated using the Kaplan Meir method. Results: The AACR-GENIE registry included 5933 samples from 5553 patients; 892 (16%) patients were ≤50 years old and 4661 (84%) were >50 years old. This cohort includes patients across all stages of disease. 64% were male in YO group versus 73% in group > 50 years. 11% of patients in YO group were of Asian race compared with 6% in older group. The older onset group demonstrated a significantly higher gene altered frequency (p<0.001). At a sample level analysis, significant genomic alterations between both age cohorts were identified in 21 genes. In particular, there were only two genes, CDH1 (p<0.001) and CCNE1 (p<0.001), found to be significantly observed more frequently in YO patients compared with the older onset group. These mutations have been associated with hereditary gastric cancer syndromes, aggressive disease and poorer survival. Amongst the 19 genes significantly observed more frequently in the older onset group was the hereditary APC gene p<0.001 and TP53 (<0.001). Potentially targetable markers such as CDKN2A (p<0.001), KRAS (p<0.001), FGF4 (p<0.001), and FGFR3 (p<0.001) were also significantly observed more frequently in patients >50 years old. In the earlier analysis of GENIE (Version 13.1) with 2874 patients median OS (all stages) in YO GEC was 37 months (26.6-59.5) versus 28.9 months (26.3- 32.5) (95% CI) in older onset patients, however this was not significant (p=0.057). Conclusions: The GENIE analysis provides a comprehensive landscape of the clinical and genomic data in patients with YO and older onset GEC. Fewer somatic alterations were observed in YO GEC. Further exploration of these results and updated survival are vital to better understand the biological mechanisms and differences observed and to pinpoint potential biomarkers for diagnostic assays and personalized therapy. Citation Format: Ronan Andrew McLaughlin, Yvonne Bach, Esraa Mahmoud, Nadia Ghazali, Sheeraz Ali, Harry Harvey, Zac Coyne, Ekaterina Kosyachkova, Carly Barron, Hiroko Aoyama, Sokaina Akhtar, Raymond Jang, Eric Chen, Kevin Wang, Lucy Ma, Sangeetha Kalimuthu, Aruz Mesci, Rebecca Wong, Elliot Wakeam, Jonathan Yeung, Philippe Bedard, Elena Elimova. Differences in the clinical and genomic landscape in young onset (YO) gastroesophageal cancer (GEC): an analysis from AACR Project GENIE [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 1127.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-1127
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 1127: Differences in the clinical and genomic landscape in young onset (YO) gastroesophageal cancer (GEC): an analysis from AACR Project GENIE

Rebecca Wong, Sangeetha Kalimuthu, Sheeraz Ali, Kevin Wang et al.
Cancer Research
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Abstract 1127: Differences in the clinical and genomic landscape in young onset (YO) gastroesophageal cancer (GEC): an analysis from AACR Project GENIE

Rebecca Wong, Sangeetha Kalimuthu, Sheeraz Ali, Kevin Wang, Aruz Mesci, Ekaterina Kosyachkova, Jonathan Yeung, Philippe Lucien Bedard, Sohail Akhtar, Yvonne Bach, Esraa Mahmoud, Carly C. Barron, Eric X. Chen, Ronan Andrew McLaughlin, Z. Coyne, Harry Harvey, L Ma, Hiroko Aoyama, Raymond Jang, Elena Elimova, Nadia Ghazali, Elliot Wakeam
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Although GEC is most common in the elderly population, there is a rising incidence of YO GEC defined as occurring in patients ≤50 years of age. The clinical and genomic differences between YO and older onset disease remain unclear. We aim to comprehensively explore the clinical and genomic landscape of YO GEC and compare with older onset disease (>50 years) to elucidate potential molecular differences between the two age groups that may guide therapeutic approaches in the future. Methods: Data from the Association for Cancer Research Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (AACR-GENIE) registry (version 16.1 for somatic mutation analysis and version 13.1 for survival analysis) to study patients diagnosed with GEC was queried. Patients with GEC were stratified by age at time of tumor sequencing. cBioPortal was used to analyze the differences in genetic mutation frequencies and differences were examined using chi-squared test. Overall survival (OS) between the groups was calculated using the Kaplan Meir method. Results: The AACR-GENIE registry included 5933 samples from 5553 patients; 892 (16%) patients were ≤50 years old and 4661 (84%) were >50 years old. This cohort includes patients across all stages of disease. 64% were male in YO group versus 73% in group > 50 years. 11% of patients in YO group were of Asian race compared with 6% in older group. The older onset group demonstrated a significantly higher gene altered frequency (p<0.001). At a sample level analysis, significant genomic alterations between both age cohorts were identified in 21 genes. In particular, there were only two genes, CDH1 (p<0.001) and CCNE1 (p<0.001), found to be significantly observed more frequently in YO patients compared with the older onset group. These mutations have been associated with hereditary gastric cancer syndromes, aggressive disease and poorer survival. Amongst the 19 genes significantly observed more frequently in the older onset group was the hereditary APC gene p<0.001 and TP53 (<0.001). Potentially targetable markers such as CDKN2A (p<0.001), KRAS (p<0.001), FGF4 (p<0.001), and FGFR3 (p<0.001) were also significantly observed more frequently in patients >50 years old. In the earlier analysis of GENIE (Version 13.1) with 2874 patients median OS (all stages) in YO GEC was 37 months (26.6-59.5) versus 28.9 months (26.3- 32.5) (95% CI) in older onset patients, however this was not significant (p=0.057). Conclusions: The GENIE analysis provides a comprehensive landscape of the clinical and genomic data in patients with YO and older onset GEC. Fewer somatic alterations were observed in YO GEC. Further exploration of these results and updated survival are vital to better understand the biological mechanisms and differences observed and to pinpoint potential biomarkers for diagnostic assays and personalized therapy. Citation Format: Ronan Andrew McLaughlin, Yvonne Bach, Esraa Mahmoud, Nadia Ghazali, Sheeraz Ali, Harry Harvey, Zac Coyne, Ekaterina Kosyachkova, Carly Barron, Hiroko Aoyama, Sokaina Akhtar, Raymond Jang, Eric Chen, Kevin Wang, Lucy Ma, Sangeetha Kalimuthu, Aruz Mesci, Rebecca Wong, Elliot Wakeam, Jonathan Yeung, Philippe Bedard, Elena Elimova. Differences in the clinical and genomic landscape in young onset (YO) gastroesophageal cancer (GEC): an analysis from AACR Project GENIE [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 1127.

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(8_Supplement_1)
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.