Abstract 626: Black/African American participation in cancer clinical trials: Healthcare professional perspectives

Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this community-based participatory research (CBPR) was to identify barriers and facilitators to Black/African American engagement and inclusion in cancer clinical trials in the Detroit Metropolitan Area. This presentation focuses on data from healthcare professionals at Henry Ford Cancer Institute. Design: The CBPR approach included the establishment of a Steering Committee composed of researchers, health professionals, and representatives of eight diverse organizations representing African American, African Caribbean, and Ghanaian communities. A qualitative methodology was employed to obtain contextual and experiential data. Fourteen healthcare professionals participated in individual interviews including physicians, surgeons, research nurses and navigators, clinical research coordinators, and cancer trial investigators. Interview guides were developed based on an extensive literature review. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. Data were coded and searches were conducted to identify themes within the coded data. Outcomes: Data were categorized into six constructs: 1. disparities; 2. trust; 3. advantages and disadvantages to trial participation; 4. clinical and system challenges for physicians’ trial engagement; 5. trial participant selection criteria; and 6. clinical trial recruitment protocols. Themes within disparities include inequitable access to healthcare and patient selection bias. Patient and community trust and distrust were discussed within historical and experiential abuses and neglect in Black/African American communities. Physicians perceived trial advantages to include access to new therapies and patient-internal rewards, e.g., contributing to wellbeing of future generations. Disadvantages included participants’ financial, social, and psychological costs. Physician challenges included awareness of trials, time allocation, and systemic expectations of output. Selection criteria themes were focused on the internal procedures required to identify eligible patients and the barriers associated with trial sponsor requirements. Recruitment barriers included complex consenting procedures and resources to support informed patient decision-making. Study respondents provided recommendations to address barriers for both patients and healthcare providers. Conclusions: Increasing diversity in clinical trials requires understanding barriers and facilitators at multiple levels including communities, patients and their families, healthcare professionals, health system leadership, and trial sponsors. Recognizing the experiences and perceptions of healthcare professionals is one step toward addressing the complex social environments in which cancer clinical trials reside. Recommendations from this study are being piloted. Citation Format: Linda Kaljee, Sylvester Antwi, Doreen Dankerlui, Donna Harris, Barbara Israel, Denise White-Perkins, Valerie Ofori Aboah, Livingstone Aduse-Poku, Harriet Larrious-Lartey, Barbara Brush, Chris Coombe, La'Toshia Patman, Nayomi Cawthorne, Sophia Chue, Zachary Rowe, Cassandra Mills, Kurt Fernando, Gwendolyn Daniels, Eleanor Walker, Evelyn M. Jiagge. Black/African American participation in cancer clinical trials: Healthcare professional perspectives [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 626.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-626
Primary Topic
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 626: Black/African American participation in cancer clinical trials: Healthcare professional perspectives

Linda Kaljee, Cassandra Mills, Sylvester Antwi, Denise White-Perkins et al.
Cancer Research
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
article

Abstract 626: Black/African American participation in cancer clinical trials: Healthcare professional perspectives

Linda Kaljee, Cassandra Mills, Sylvester Antwi, Denise White-Perkins, Gwendolyn Daniels, Livingstone Aduse‐Poku, Barbara L. Brush, Doreen Dankerlui, Sophia Chue, Barbara A. Israel, Evelyn Jiagge, Kurt Fernando, Zachary Rowe, Eleanor Walker, Chris M. Coombe, Valerie Ofori Aboah, La’Toshia Patman, Harriet Larrious-Lartey, Donna Harris, Nayomi Cawthorne
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this community-based participatory research (CBPR) was to identify barriers and facilitators to Black/African American engagement and inclusion in cancer clinical trials in the Detroit Metropolitan Area. This presentation focuses on data from healthcare professionals at Henry Ford Cancer Institute. Design: The CBPR approach included the establishment of a Steering Committee composed of researchers, health professionals, and representatives of eight diverse organizations representing African American, African Caribbean, and Ghanaian communities. A qualitative methodology was employed to obtain contextual and experiential data. Fourteen healthcare professionals participated in individual interviews including physicians, surgeons, research nurses and navigators, clinical research coordinators, and cancer trial investigators. Interview guides were developed based on an extensive literature review. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. Data were coded and searches were conducted to identify themes within the coded data. Outcomes: Data were categorized into six constructs: 1. disparities; 2. trust; 3. advantages and disadvantages to trial participation; 4. clinical and system challenges for physicians’ trial engagement; 5. trial participant selection criteria; and 6. clinical trial recruitment protocols. Themes within disparities include inequitable access to healthcare and patient selection bias. Patient and community trust and distrust were discussed within historical and experiential abuses and neglect in Black/African American communities. Physicians perceived trial advantages to include access to new therapies and patient-internal rewards, e.g., contributing to wellbeing of future generations. Disadvantages included participants’ financial, social, and psychological costs. Physician challenges included awareness of trials, time allocation, and systemic expectations of output. Selection criteria themes were focused on the internal procedures required to identify eligible patients and the barriers associated with trial sponsor requirements. Recruitment barriers included complex consenting procedures and resources to support informed patient decision-making. Study respondents provided recommendations to address barriers for both patients and healthcare providers. Conclusions: Increasing diversity in clinical trials requires understanding barriers and facilitators at multiple levels including communities, patients and their families, healthcare professionals, health system leadership, and trial sponsors. Recognizing the experiences and perceptions of healthcare professionals is one step toward addressing the complex social environments in which cancer clinical trials reside. Recommendations from this study are being piloted. Citation Format: Linda Kaljee, Sylvester Antwi, Doreen Dankerlui, Donna Harris, Barbara Israel, Denise White-Perkins, Valerie Ofori Aboah, Livingstone Aduse-Poku, Harriet Larrious-Lartey, Barbara Brush, Chris Coombe, La'Toshia Patman, Nayomi Cawthorne, Sophia Chue, Zachary Rowe, Cassandra Mills, Kurt Fernando, Gwendolyn Daniels, Eleanor Walker, Evelyn M. Jiagge. Black/African American participation in cancer clinical trials: Healthcare professional perspectives [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 626.

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(8_Supplement_1)
Henry Ford Health System (US), University of Michigan (US), University of Florida (US), Skin Wellness Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.