Privatization Through Building Use Rights in The Tangerang Sea Fence Area According to Positive Law

The privatization of marine space in Tangerang through sea fences and Building Use Rights (HGB) certificates harms the local economy. All forms of natural resource privatization in Indonesia must consider their legality. The purpose of this research is to analyze the legality of the Tangerang Sea fence and the legal certainty of HGB certificates in the privatization of marine space. This research uses a normative juridical approach with secondary data. The research results indicate that this privatization violates Indonesian positive law because it does not meet the licensing procedures, contradicts Article 33, paragraph 4 of the 1945 Constitution, and harms the community. The HGB certificate is also invalid because it violates spatial planning regulations and the principle of common property.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Syiar Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Published
2025-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29313/shjih.v22i2.14738
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Privatization Through Building Use Rights in The Tangerang Sea Fence Area According to Positive Law

Alfi Taufiq Asyidqi, Sultan Alvaro Dwiyanto, Anwar Hafidz Amrullah
Syiar Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

Privatization Through Building Use Rights in The Tangerang Sea Fence Area According to Positive Law

Alfi Taufiq Asyidqi, Sultan Alvaro Dwiyanto, Anwar Hafidz Amrullah
article en

Abstract

The privatization of marine space in Tangerang through sea fences and Building Use Rights (HGB) certificates harms the local economy. All forms of natural resource privatization in Indonesia must consider their legality. The purpose of this research is to analyze the legality of the Tangerang Sea fence and the legal certainty of HGB certificates in the privatization of marine space. This research uses a normative juridical approach with secondary data. The research results indicate that this privatization violates Indonesian positive law because it does not meet the licensing procedures, contradicts Article 33, paragraph 4 of the 1945 Constitution, and harms the community. The HGB certificate is also invalid because it violates spatial planning regulations and the principle of common property.

Syiar Hukum Jurnal Ilmu HukumVol. 22(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.