Adoption of enhanced multislice spiral computed tomography combined with magnetic resonance imaging in staging and preoperative assessment of colon cancer patients

BackgroundColon cancer (CC) refers to malignant tumor of the digestive tract worldwide and is also among the cancers with high mortality rates.ObjectiveThe aim of this work was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of multislice spiral CT (MSCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and MSCT + MRI in different stages of colon cancer (CC) (T1-T2, T3, T4). This work compared the differences in sensitivity (<i>Sen</i>), specificity (<i>Spe</i>), accuracy (Acc), and area under the curve (AUC) values among these methods and explored the optimal diagnostic strategy.MethodsA total of 120 patients with CC confirmed by pathological biopsy and 30 individuals suspected of CC but without detected tumors (as controls) were selected. All subjects underwent MSCT, MRI, and combined MSCT + MRI examinations. Statistical analyses of <i>Sen</i>, <i>Spe</i>, <i>Acc</i>, and AUC values were performed.ResultsIn the T1-T2 stage, MSCT had a <i>Sen</i> of 85.2%, <i>Acc</i> of 86.8%, and an AUC value of 0.878; MRI had a <i>Spe</i> of 91.0%, <i>Sen</i> of 81.6%, and an AUC value of 0.865; the combined MSCT + MRI examination had a <i>Sen</i> of 90.6% and an AUC of 0.903. In the T3 stage, MRI had a significantly higher <i>Sen</i> (91.7%) than MSCT (80.0%), with an AUC of 0.887, while the combined MSCT + MRI examination had a <i>Sen</i> of 98.3% and an AUC of 0.942. In the T4 stage, the combined MSCT + MRI examination performed the best, with a <i>Sen</i> of 100% and an AUC of 0.933, and compared with MSCT or MRI alone, the differences were statistically significant (<i>P </i>< 0.05).ConclusionMSCT and MRI each have their own advantages in the diagnosis of different stages of CC. MSCT is suitable for initial screening in the T1-T2 stage, while MRI is more effective in assessing tumor invasiveness in the T3 and higher stages. The combined MSCT + MRI examination can provide more comprehensive diagnostic information, especially in the T4 stage, where it shows the highest <i>Sen</i> and <i>Acc</i>. Selecting the appropriate examination method based on the patient's specific condition and staging needs is of great significance in improving the diagnostic <i>Acc</i> of CC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09592989251335125
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adoption of enhanced multislice spiral computed tomography combined with magnetic resonance imaging in staging and preoperative assessment of colon cancer patients

Junfang Bai, Ying Wu, Fei Zhao, Limei Wang et al.
Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Adoption of enhanced multislice spiral computed tomography combined with magnetic resonance imaging in staging and preoperative assessment of colon cancer patients

Junfang Bai, Ying Wu, Fei Zhao, Limei Wang, Dan Wang, Cong Liang
article en

Abstract

BackgroundColon cancer (CC) refers to malignant tumor of the digestive tract worldwide and is also among the cancers with high mortality rates.ObjectiveThe aim of this work was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of multislice spiral CT (MSCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and MSCT + MRI in different stages of colon cancer (CC) (T1-T2, T3, T4). This work compared the differences in sensitivity (<i>Sen</i>), specificity (<i>Spe</i>), accuracy (Acc), and area under the curve (AUC) values among these methods and explored the optimal diagnostic strategy.MethodsA total of 120 patients with CC confirmed by pathological biopsy and 30 individuals suspected of CC but without detected tumors (as controls) were selected. All subjects underwent MSCT, MRI, and combined MSCT + MRI examinations. Statistical analyses of <i>Sen</i>, <i>Spe</i>, <i>Acc</i>, and AUC values were performed.ResultsIn the T1-T2 stage, MSCT had a <i>Sen</i> of 85.2%, <i>Acc</i> of 86.8%, and an AUC value of 0.878; MRI had a <i>Spe</i> of 91.0%, <i>Sen</i> of 81.6%, and an AUC value of 0.865; the combined MSCT + MRI examination had a <i>Sen</i> of 90.6% and an AUC of 0.903. In the T3 stage, MRI had a significantly higher <i>Sen</i> (91.7%) than MSCT (80.0%), with an AUC of 0.887, while the combined MSCT + MRI examination had a <i>Sen</i> of 98.3% and an AUC of 0.942. In the T4 stage, the combined MSCT + MRI examination performed the best, with a <i>Sen</i> of 100% and an AUC of 0.933, and compared with MSCT or MRI alone, the differences were statistically significant (<i>P </i>< 0.05).ConclusionMSCT and MRI each have their own advantages in the diagnosis of different stages of CC. MSCT is suitable for initial screening in the T1-T2 stage, while MRI is more effective in assessing tumor invasiveness in the T3 and higher stages. The combined MSCT + MRI examination can provide more comprehensive diagnostic information, especially in the T4 stage, where it shows the highest <i>Sen</i> and <i>Acc</i>. Selecting the appropriate examination method based on the patient's specific condition and staging needs is of great significance in improving the diagnostic <i>Acc</i> of CC.

Bio-Medical Materials and EngineeringVol. 36(5)
Shanxi Medical University (CN), Xian Yang Central Hospital (CN), Shanxi Provincial People’s Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.