Revised methodology for CO <sub>2</sub> and CH <sub>4</sub> measurements at remote sites using a working standard-gas-saving system

Abstract. We have revised a calculation method of mole fractions and uncertainties for in situ CO2 and CH4 measurements with a working standard-gas-saving system. It uses on-site compressed air to track the baseline drift of sensors. The Japan–Russia Siberian Tall Tower Inland Observation Network (JR-STATION) is made up of this system, which was installed across nine different sites in Siberia. The system acquires semi-continuous data by alternating between sampling air from multiple altitudes through switched flow paths and recording several minutes of averaged data for each altitude. We estimated the sensor repeatability (ur) based on the measurement of on-site compressed air. The ur for CO2 and CH4 was mostly around 0.05 ppm and below 5 ppb, respectively. The combined standard uncertainties (uc(x)) of time-averaged ambient air measurements were sometimes higher than the ur for each period because the data included atmospheric variability during the measurement period of several minutes. Data users should consider the difference between the ur and uc(x) to select optimal data, depending on their focusing spatial scale. The CO2 and CH4 data measured with a non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) analyzer and a tin dioxide sensor (TOS) exhibited good agreement with those measured by cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-1717-2025
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revised methodology for CO 2 and CH 4 measurements at remote sites using a working standard-gas-saving system

Toshinobu Machida, B. D. Belan, Mikhail Arshinov, Denis Davydov et al.
2 citations
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
2.21
article

Revised methodology for CO 2 and CH 4 measurements at remote sites using a working standard-gas-saving system

Toshinobu Machida, B. D. Belan, Mikhail Arshinov, Denis Davydov, Motoki Sasakawa, Noritsugu Tsuda, A. V. Fofonov
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract. We have revised a calculation method of mole fractions and uncertainties for in situ CO2 and CH4 measurements with a working standard-gas-saving system. It uses on-site compressed air to track the baseline drift of sensors. The Japan–Russia Siberian Tall Tower Inland Observation Network (JR-STATION) is made up of this system, which was installed across nine different sites in Siberia. The system acquires semi-continuous data by alternating between sampling air from multiple altitudes through switched flow paths and recording several minutes of averaged data for each altitude. We estimated the sensor repeatability (ur) based on the measurement of on-site compressed air. The ur for CO2 and CH4 was mostly around 0.05 ppm and below 5 ppb, respectively. The combined standard uncertainties (uc(x)) of time-averaged ambient air measurements were sometimes higher than the ur for each period because the data included atmospheric variability during the measurement period of several minutes. Data users should consider the difference between the ur and uc(x) to select optimal data, depending on their focusing spatial scale. The CO2 and CH4 data measured with a non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) analyzer and a tin dioxide sensor (TOS) exhibited good agreement with those measured by cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS).

Atmospheric measurement techniquesVol. 18(8)
Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP), V.E. Zuev Institute of Atmospheric Optics (RU)
Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.