Abstract 3214: The duration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in oncology: Longer is not better

Abstract ICI addition to the oncology armamentarium provided significant therapeutic benefits. Standard schedule of ICI calls for 2-year regimen without rational justification. Doses selected clearly do not adhere to classic maximal tolerated dose since ICIs were doubled at longer dose intervals. Theoretically however, multiple concerns can be proposed to question the 2-year duration. In human neoadjuvant melanoma studies examining ICI effect on effector T-cells comprehensively documented the expected clonal expansion in target cells but this was noted only for few weeks and did not continue upon repeated dosing, a major challenge to the current standard dosing schedule. Therapeutic T-cell transfers administer a single dose of 109 , a bulk that is expected to require 2-3 weeks of lymphocyte proliferation. Neutralizing antibodies have been reported in multiple studies, but notably without detriment to the therapeutic impact. Lastly, published and unpublished cases confirm lasting benefits (in years) after single ICI dosing. We hypothesized that benefits of ICI depend mostly, if not entirely, on the first, or few initial doses; that doses later in time can be delivered but add little if anything to the therapeutic impact. Methods/Results: we reviewed published ICI monotherapy or chemo-ICI which provided individual swimmers’ plot in stage 4 melanoma, renal cell and NSCLC. We extracted the median survival (MS) of those who received variable ICI durations excluding progression as the cause for halting therapy. Patients with progressive disease beyond 6 months, were included because they received considerable durations of ICI and might enjoy lasting benefits. We report the MS in the times depicted in the table. Our data reveal comparable results in all subgroups supporting our hypothesis. Conclusions: Despite standard recommendations, there is considerable rationale in addition to our current data to challenge the common duration of ICI and substantiate a far more limited exposure to ICI. Table ICI Duration Median Survival (Months) Number of Cases 1-3 months 27 29 3-6 months 31.5 24 6-12 months 32 63 12-18 months 35 30 18-24 months 37 47 24+ months 48 32 Citation Format: Farah Mazahreh, Samuel L. Schach, Liyan Mazahreh, A. Mazin Safar. The duration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in oncology: Longer is not better [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 3214.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-3214
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 3214: The duration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in oncology: Longer is not better

Liyan Mazahreh, A. Mazin Safar, Samuel L. Schach, Farah Mazahvreh
Cancer Research
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Abstract 3214: The duration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in oncology: Longer is not better

Liyan Mazahreh, A. Mazin Safar, Samuel L. Schach, Farah Mazahvreh
article en

Abstract

Abstract ICI addition to the oncology armamentarium provided significant therapeutic benefits. Standard schedule of ICI calls for 2-year regimen without rational justification. Doses selected clearly do not adhere to classic maximal tolerated dose since ICIs were doubled at longer dose intervals. Theoretically however, multiple concerns can be proposed to question the 2-year duration. In human neoadjuvant melanoma studies examining ICI effect on effector T-cells comprehensively documented the expected clonal expansion in target cells but this was noted only for few weeks and did not continue upon repeated dosing, a major challenge to the current standard dosing schedule. Therapeutic T-cell transfers administer a single dose of 109 , a bulk that is expected to require 2-3 weeks of lymphocyte proliferation. Neutralizing antibodies have been reported in multiple studies, but notably without detriment to the therapeutic impact. Lastly, published and unpublished cases confirm lasting benefits (in years) after single ICI dosing. We hypothesized that benefits of ICI depend mostly, if not entirely, on the first, or few initial doses; that doses later in time can be delivered but add little if anything to the therapeutic impact. Methods/Results: we reviewed published ICI monotherapy or chemo-ICI which provided individual swimmers’ plot in stage 4 melanoma, renal cell and NSCLC. We extracted the median survival (MS) of those who received variable ICI durations excluding progression as the cause for halting therapy. Patients with progressive disease beyond 6 months, were included because they received considerable durations of ICI and might enjoy lasting benefits. We report the MS in the times depicted in the table. Our data reveal comparable results in all subgroups supporting our hypothesis. Conclusions: Despite standard recommendations, there is considerable rationale in addition to our current data to challenge the common duration of ICI and substantiate a far more limited exposure to ICI. Table ICI Duration Median Survival (Months) Number of Cases 1-3 months 27 29 3-6 months 31.5 24 6-12 months 32 63 12-18 months 35 30 18-24 months 37 47 24+ months 48 32 Citation Format: Farah Mazahreh, Samuel L. Schach, Liyan Mazahreh, A. Mazin Safar. The duration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in oncology: Longer is not better [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 3214.

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(8_Supplement_1)
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.