From Hegel to Nietzsche: Losurdo’s Critical Entanglements with Liberalism

Abstract This article examines Domenico Losurdo’s treatment of Hegel, Marx, Engels, and Nietzsche with the aim of unearthing his critical entanglements with liberalism. I will argue that Losurdo’s reflections on these thinkers betray a deeper ambivalence towards liberalism as a political tradition. This ambivalence ranges depending on which of the thinkers is under Losurdo’s microscope, receiving its starkest expression in Losurdo’s treatment of Nietzsche. By closely engaging with Losurdo’s treatment of Hegel, Marx, Engels, and Nietzsche, one leaves with a deeper grasp of these individual thinkers and the political implications of their respective philosophies. In much the same way, Losurdo’s work encourages readers to interrogate their own attitudes towards liberalism’s dialectic of emancipation and dis-emancipation. The only difference is that liberalism is now under renewed attack from a variety of political quarters. Consequently, Losurdo’s critical entanglements with liberalism could not have come at a better time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Historical Materialism
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206x-bja10073
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Hegel to Nietzsche: Losurdo’s Critical Entanglements with Liberalism

Igor Shoikhedbrod
2 citations
Historical Materialism
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
34.53
article

From Hegel to Nietzsche: Losurdo’s Critical Entanglements with Liberalism

Igor Shoikhedbrod
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article examines Domenico Losurdo’s treatment of Hegel, Marx, Engels, and Nietzsche with the aim of unearthing his critical entanglements with liberalism. I will argue that Losurdo’s reflections on these thinkers betray a deeper ambivalence towards liberalism as a political tradition. This ambivalence ranges depending on which of the thinkers is under Losurdo’s microscope, receiving its starkest expression in Losurdo’s treatment of Nietzsche. By closely engaging with Losurdo’s treatment of Hegel, Marx, Engels, and Nietzsche, one leaves with a deeper grasp of these individual thinkers and the political implications of their respective philosophies. In much the same way, Losurdo’s work encourages readers to interrogate their own attitudes towards liberalism’s dialectic of emancipation and dis-emancipation. The only difference is that liberalism is now under renewed attack from a variety of political quarters. Consequently, Losurdo’s critical entanglements with liberalism could not have come at a better time.

Historical MaterialismVol. 32(4)
St. Francis Xavier University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
34.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From Hegel to Nietzsche: Losurdo’s Critical Entanglements with Liberalism — Igor Shoikhedbrod · Historical Materialism (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS