Self-Saboteur: The Experience of Latin American Populism

Abstract This editorial perspective develops a theoretical critique of populism in Latin America, which it takes to be the predominant form that reformist politics has assumed in the region since the 1930s. It outlines an analytical approach pivoting on the five elements of hegemonic crisis, state arbitration of class struggle, asymmetrical multi-class coalition, top-down mobilisation of popular support through mechanisms of controlled inclusion and a self-undermining paradox common to reformism more generally. This framework is sufficiently abstract to enable portability across different times and spaces of modern capitalist development in Latin America. With the five analytical premises established as a backdrop, the editorial perspective then examines what is specific to Latin American populism in the twenty-first century, followed by a detailed investigation of the phenomenon in Ecuador. The editorial perspective demonstrates that it is impossible to understand the region’s present destituent impasse – in which the far-right enjoys considerable advantages – without a thoroughgoing autopsy of the preceding Pink Tide populist conjuncture from which it emerged.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Historical Materialism
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206x-bja10067
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Political theory and Gramsci
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-Saboteur: The Experience of Latin American Populism

Jeffery R. Webber
1 citations
Historical Materialism
Political theory and Gramsci
4.20
article

Self-Saboteur: The Experience of Latin American Populism

Jeffery R. Webber
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This editorial perspective develops a theoretical critique of populism in Latin America, which it takes to be the predominant form that reformist politics has assumed in the region since the 1930s. It outlines an analytical approach pivoting on the five elements of hegemonic crisis, state arbitration of class struggle, asymmetrical multi-class coalition, top-down mobilisation of popular support through mechanisms of controlled inclusion and a self-undermining paradox common to reformism more generally. This framework is sufficiently abstract to enable portability across different times and spaces of modern capitalist development in Latin America. With the five analytical premises established as a backdrop, the editorial perspective then examines what is specific to Latin American populism in the twenty-first century, followed by a detailed investigation of the phenomenon in Ecuador. The editorial perspective demonstrates that it is impossible to understand the region’s present destituent impasse – in which the far-right enjoys considerable advantages – without a thoroughgoing autopsy of the preceding Pink Tide populist conjuncture from which it emerged.

Historical MaterialismVol. 32(4)
York University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Political theory and Gramsci
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.