Technical note: What does the Standardized Streamflow Index actually reflect? Insights and implications for hydrological drought analysis

Abstract. Hydrological drought is one of the main hydroclimatic hazards worldwide, affecting water availability, ecosystems, and socioeconomic activities. This phenomenon is commonly characterized by the Standardized Streamflow Index (SSI), which is widely used because of its straightforward formulation and calculation. Nevertheless, there is limited understanding of what the SSI actually reveals about how climate anomalies propagate through the terrestrial water cycle. To find possible explanations, we implemented the Structure for Unifying Multiple Modeling Alternatives (SUMMA) coupled with the mizuRoute routing model in six hydroclimatically different case study basins located on the western slopes of the extratropical Andes and examined correlations between the SSI (computed from the models for 1-, 3-, and 6-month timescales) and potential explanatory variables – including precipitation and simulated catchment-scale storages – aggregated at different timescales. Additionally, we analyzed the impacts of adopting commonly used timescales on propagation analyses of specific drought events – from meteorological to soil moisture and hydrological drought – with focus on their duration and intensity. The results reveal that the choice of timescale for the SSI has larger effects on correlations with explanatory variables in rainfall-dominated regimes compared to snowmelt-driven basins, especially when simulated fluxes and storages are aggregated to timescales longer than 9 months. In all the basins analyzed, the strongest relationships (Spearman rank correlation values over 0.7) were obtained when using 6-month timescales to compute the SSI and 9–12 months to compute the explanatory variables, excepting aquifer storage in snowmelt-driven basins. Finally, the results show that the trajectories of drought propagation obtained with the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), the Standardized Soil Moisture Index (SSMI), and the SSI may change drastically with the selection of timescale. Overall, this study highlights the need for caution when selecting standardized drought indices and associated timescales, since their choice impacts event characterizations, monitoring, and propagation analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrology and earth system sciences
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1981-2025
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technical note: What does the Standardized Streamflow Index actually reflect? Insights and implications for hydrological drought analysis

Fabián Lema, Pablo A. Mendoza, Mauricio Zambrano‐Bigiarini, Ximena Vargas et al.
8 citations
Hydrology and earth system sciences
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
8.84
article

Technical note: What does the Standardized Streamflow Index actually reflect? Insights and implications for hydrological drought analysis

Fabián Lema, Pablo A. Mendoza, Mauricio Zambrano‐Bigiarini, Ximena Vargas, Naoki Mizukami, Nicolás Vasquéz
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Hydrological drought is one of the main hydroclimatic hazards worldwide, affecting water availability, ecosystems, and socioeconomic activities. This phenomenon is commonly characterized by the Standardized Streamflow Index (SSI), which is widely used because of its straightforward formulation and calculation. Nevertheless, there is limited understanding of what the SSI actually reveals about how climate anomalies propagate through the terrestrial water cycle. To find possible explanations, we implemented the Structure for Unifying Multiple Modeling Alternatives (SUMMA) coupled with the mizuRoute routing model in six hydroclimatically different case study basins located on the western slopes of the extratropical Andes and examined correlations between the SSI (computed from the models for 1-, 3-, and 6-month timescales) and potential explanatory variables – including precipitation and simulated catchment-scale storages – aggregated at different timescales. Additionally, we analyzed the impacts of adopting commonly used timescales on propagation analyses of specific drought events – from meteorological to soil moisture and hydrological drought – with focus on their duration and intensity. The results reveal that the choice of timescale for the SSI has larger effects on correlations with explanatory variables in rainfall-dominated regimes compared to snowmelt-driven basins, especially when simulated fluxes and storages are aggregated to timescales longer than 9 months. In all the basins analyzed, the strongest relationships (Spearman rank correlation values over 0.7) were obtained when using 6-month timescales to compute the SSI and 9–12 months to compute the explanatory variables, excepting aquifer storage in snowmelt-driven basins. Finally, the results show that the trajectories of drought propagation obtained with the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), the Standardized Soil Moisture Index (SSMI), and the SSI may change drastically with the selection of timescale. Overall, this study highlights the need for caution when selecting standardized drought indices and associated timescales, since their choice impacts event characterizations, monitoring, and propagation analyses.

Hydrology and earth system sciencesVol. 29(8)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), Universidad de La Frontera (CL), Research Applications (United States) (US), Center for Climate and Resilience Research (CL), University of Chile (CL)
Government of Canada, Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico, Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
8.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.