Role of regional and global datasets in the simulation of intense tropical cyclones over Bay of Bengal region in a convection‐permitting scale

Abstract The efficacy of global and regional datasets on the prediction of extremely severe cyclonic storms over the Bay of Bengal (BoB) was evaluated using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model in a double‐nested domain with a 4 km finer resolution on three different datasets, namely FNL, ERA‐Interim, and Indian Monsoon Data Assimilation and Analysis (IMDAA). The initial cyclonic vortex, the vertical profile of horizontal wind speed, and relative humidity from different datasets were assessed to evaluate the initial structure and validated with IMD best‐fit track data. The model results highlight that simulations with FNL data predict tracks and intensities more accurately for the majority of cyclonic storms compared with the IMDAA and ERA‐Interim datasets. Simulations with FNL data exhibit the least mean track errors of 70, 126, 121, and 204 km for days 1–4, respectively. Additionally, the mean wind error of five extremely severe cyclonic storms (ESCSs) using FNL data is approximately 9.3, 4.6, 7.7, and 10.9 m/s, respectively, from day 1 to day 4. It is observed that the regional reanalysis of IMDAA datasets outperformed the forecast of several parameters such as maximum surface wind speed, central sea level pressure, and rainfall for the ESCSs Fani and Sidr . The FNL dataset overpredicted the amount of 24‐h accumulated rainfall compared with the ERA‐Interim and IMDAA datasets, whereas the IMDAA dataset performed better with lower values of root mean square error (148 mm/day), standard deviation (124 mm/day), and higher correlation (0.68) with the TRMM dataset. Model predictions highlight that the regional dataset IMDAA performs better in predicting rainfall magnitude compared with the global dataset due to the added assimilation of numerous local observations. The regional dataset could be improved by exploring large‐scale circulation features and their significant role in predicting the track, intensity, and landfall location of the tropical cyclones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meteorological Applications
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/met.70044
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of regional and global datasets in the simulation of intense tropical cyclones over Bay of Bengal region in a convection‐permitting scale

K P Singh, Thatiparthi Koteshwaramma
3 citations
Meteorological Applications
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
3.90
article

Role of regional and global datasets in the simulation of intense tropical cyclones over Bay of Bengal region in a convection‐permitting scale

K P Singh, Thatiparthi Koteshwaramma
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The efficacy of global and regional datasets on the prediction of extremely severe cyclonic storms over the Bay of Bengal (BoB) was evaluated using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model in a double‐nested domain with a 4 km finer resolution on three different datasets, namely FNL, ERA‐Interim, and Indian Monsoon Data Assimilation and Analysis (IMDAA). The initial cyclonic vortex, the vertical profile of horizontal wind speed, and relative humidity from different datasets were assessed to evaluate the initial structure and validated with IMD best‐fit track data. The model results highlight that simulations with FNL data predict tracks and intensities more accurately for the majority of cyclonic storms compared with the IMDAA and ERA‐Interim datasets. Simulations with FNL data exhibit the least mean track errors of 70, 126, 121, and 204 km for days 1–4, respectively. Additionally, the mean wind error of five extremely severe cyclonic storms (ESCSs) using FNL data is approximately 9.3, 4.6, 7.7, and 10.9 m/s, respectively, from day 1 to day 4. It is observed that the regional reanalysis of IMDAA datasets outperformed the forecast of several parameters such as maximum surface wind speed, central sea level pressure, and rainfall for the ESCSs Fani and Sidr . The FNL dataset overpredicted the amount of 24‐h accumulated rainfall compared with the ERA‐Interim and IMDAA datasets, whereas the IMDAA dataset performed better with lower values of root mean square error (148 mm/day), standard deviation (124 mm/day), and higher correlation (0.68) with the TRMM dataset. Model predictions highlight that the regional dataset IMDAA performs better in predicting rainfall magnitude compared with the global dataset due to the added assimilation of numerous local observations. The regional dataset could be improved by exploring large‐scale circulation features and their significant role in predicting the track, intensity, and landfall location of the tropical cyclones.

Meteorological ApplicationsVol. 32(2)
Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India, VIT University, Science and Engineering Research Board
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
3.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.