Comparative analysis of a 5G campus network and existing networks for real-time consultation in remote pathology

The rapid advancements in digital pathology, particularly in whole-slide imaging (WSI), have transformed remote histological analysis by enabling high-resolution digitization and real-time consultations. However, these workflows place significant demands on network infrastructure, requiring high bandwidth, low latency, and consistent performance. Whereas 5G networks have been extensively studied in controlled lab environments, their real-world applications in clinical settings remain underexplored. This study provides a comparative analysis of 5G Campus Networks (5G CN) and traditional institutional networks, focusing on their performance during remote pathology tasks. Key metrics such as throughput, latency, and image quality were evaluated under various device loads to simulate real-world conditions. Although 5G CN did not consistently outperform in absolute throughput, it demonstrated superior adaptability, lower latency, and reduced variability, ensuring stable performance even with increasing network demand. These attributes are critical for time-sensitive workflows like frozen section analysis, where reliability and speed are paramount. The findings highlight the potential of 5G CN to support emerging digital pathology applications, including real-time consultation. Furthermore, the study underscores the need for future research on 5G slicing and its ability to optimize network resources for high-demand medical applications. This work provides valuable insights into optimizing network infrastructure for the evolving demands of remote diagnostics in digital pathology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2025.100444
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of a 5G campus network and existing networks for real-time consultation in remote pathology

I. I. Guseinov, Thomas Spittler, Arnab Bhowmik, Somaia AbuBaker et al.
1 citations
Journal of Pathology Informatics
AI in cancer detection
2.48
article

Comparative analysis of a 5G campus network and existing networks for real-time consultation in remote pathology

I. I. Guseinov, Thomas Spittler, Arnab Bhowmik, Somaia AbuBaker, Anna E Schmaus-Klughammer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The rapid advancements in digital pathology, particularly in whole-slide imaging (WSI), have transformed remote histological analysis by enabling high-resolution digitization and real-time consultations. However, these workflows place significant demands on network infrastructure, requiring high bandwidth, low latency, and consistent performance. Whereas 5G networks have been extensively studied in controlled lab environments, their real-world applications in clinical settings remain underexplored. This study provides a comparative analysis of 5G Campus Networks (5G CN) and traditional institutional networks, focusing on their performance during remote pathology tasks. Key metrics such as throughput, latency, and image quality were evaluated under various device loads to simulate real-world conditions. Although 5G CN did not consistently outperform in absolute throughput, it demonstrated superior adaptability, lower latency, and reduced variability, ensuring stable performance even with increasing network demand. These attributes are critical for time-sensitive workflows like frozen section analysis, where reliability and speed are paramount. The findings highlight the potential of 5G CN to support emerging digital pathology applications, including real-time consultation. Furthermore, the study underscores the need for future research on 5G slicing and its ability to optimize network resources for high-demand medical applications. This work provides valuable insights into optimizing network infrastructure for the evolving demands of remote diagnostics in digital pathology.

Journal of Pathology InformaticsVol. 18
Deggendorf Institute of Technology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
AI in cancer detection
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative analysis of a 5G campus network and existing networks for real-time consultation in remote pathology — I. I. Guseinov, Thomas Spittler, et al. · Journal of Pathology Informatics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS