Learning Model of Discovery to Improve The Student’s Creativity in Class XI

This Classroom Action Research employs the Learning Model of Discovery to enhance students' creativity in understanding Elasticity and Hooke's Law. The research follows a classroom action research methodology. The findings reveal a progressive improvement in students' creativity across the first cycle, and second cycle. In the first cycle, non-creative students reduced to 2.8%, moderately creative students were 57.2%, creative students were 14.3%, and very creative students were 25.7%. In cycle II, non-creative students remained at 2.8%, moderately student’s creativity improved to 74.2%, creative students were 20%, and very creative students were 2.8%. Additionally, this study showed an improvement in student’s creativity, with a 0.54 N-gain, categorizing it as Average

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IPF Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26740/ipf.v14n1.p52-56
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning Model of Discovery to Improve The Student’s Creativity in Class XI

Diki Maulana, Eka Riana, Vina Serevina, Hilma Suhailah Rizky Hasibuan
IPF Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Learning Model of Discovery to Improve The Student’s Creativity in Class XI

Diki Maulana, Eka Riana, Vina Serevina, Hilma Suhailah Rizky Hasibuan
article en

Abstract

This Classroom Action Research employs the Learning Model of Discovery to enhance students' creativity in understanding Elasticity and Hooke's Law. The research follows a classroom action research methodology. The findings reveal a progressive improvement in students' creativity across the first cycle, and second cycle. In the first cycle, non-creative students reduced to 2.8%, moderately creative students were 57.2%, creative students were 14.3%, and very creative students were 25.7%. In cycle II, non-creative students remained at 2.8%, moderately student’s creativity improved to 74.2%, creative students were 20%, and very creative students were 2.8%. Additionally, this study showed an improvement in student’s creativity, with a 0.54 N-gain, categorizing it as Average

IPF Inovasi Pendidikan FisikaVol. 14(1)
State University of Jakarta (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.