Traumatic hyphema after closed-globe injuries: accompanying findings, management and visual outcomes

Aims: The aim of this study is to present the clinical findings and treatment approaches of patients with traumatic hyphema. Methods: The files of patients with traumatic hyphema who were diagnosed and treated in our clinic were retrospectively reviewed as part of the study. Hyphema grading was based on the level of hyphema at the time of initial presentation Results: A total of 25 cases of traumatic hyphema were evaluated in the study, consisting of 18 males (72%) and 7 females (28%). The average age of the patients was 44.7 ± 24.4 years. Among the cases, 1 had stage 0 hyphema (4%), 13 had Stage 1 hyphema (52%), 5 had Stage 2 (20%), 5 had Stage 3 (20%), and 1 had Stage 4 (4%). At the time of presentation, the best-corrected visual acuity of the patients was 1.24±0.99 logMAR which increased to 0.16±0.27 logMAR at the last follow-up. The intraocular pressures were 25±13.4 at the initial visit and 13.4±9.9 at the last follow-up. Anti-glaucomatous treatment was initiated in 10 (40%) cases due to elevated intraocular pressure. An anterior chamber lavage was performed on 4 cases. The common findings accompanying hyphema included: 12% iridodialysis, 12% phacodonesis, 12%vitreous hemorrhage, 8% traumatic cataract, 8% corneal lamellar laceration and 8% commotio retinae. Conclusion: Visual outcomes in cases of traumatic hyphema are generally favorable. Close monitoring is essential during the treatment process and in the management of complications in cases of traumatic hyphema.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Ophthalmological Research
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51271/aor-0029
Primary Topic
Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Traumatic hyphema after closed-globe injuries: accompanying findings, management and visual outcomes

Raşit Kılıç, Şerife Gülhan Konuk, Münteha Merve Özarslan
Archives of Ophthalmological Research
Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
article

Traumatic hyphema after closed-globe injuries: accompanying findings, management and visual outcomes

Raşit Kılıç, Şerife Gülhan Konuk, Münteha Merve Özarslan
article en

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study is to present the clinical findings and treatment approaches of patients with traumatic hyphema. Methods: The files of patients with traumatic hyphema who were diagnosed and treated in our clinic were retrospectively reviewed as part of the study. Hyphema grading was based on the level of hyphema at the time of initial presentation Results: A total of 25 cases of traumatic hyphema were evaluated in the study, consisting of 18 males (72%) and 7 females (28%). The average age of the patients was 44.7 ± 24.4 years. Among the cases, 1 had stage 0 hyphema (4%), 13 had Stage 1 hyphema (52%), 5 had Stage 2 (20%), 5 had Stage 3 (20%), and 1 had Stage 4 (4%). At the time of presentation, the best-corrected visual acuity of the patients was 1.24±0.99 logMAR which increased to 0.16±0.27 logMAR at the last follow-up. The intraocular pressures were 25±13.4 at the initial visit and 13.4±9.9 at the last follow-up. Anti-glaucomatous treatment was initiated in 10 (40%) cases due to elevated intraocular pressure. An anterior chamber lavage was performed on 4 cases. The common findings accompanying hyphema included: 12% iridodialysis, 12% phacodonesis, 12%vitreous hemorrhage, 8% traumatic cataract, 8% corneal lamellar laceration and 8% commotio retinae. Conclusion: Visual outcomes in cases of traumatic hyphema are generally favorable. Close monitoring is essential during the treatment process and in the management of complications in cases of traumatic hyphema.

Archives of Ophthalmological ResearchVol. 2(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.