Experimental study of solar thermal energy storage finned tanks filled with different storage materials (PCM, gravel, and water)

• The thermal performance of TES units filled with various materials is assessed experimentally. • The storage capacity of gravel and PCM are compared with water. • PCM-filled tank exposed best performance over other tanks. • The gravel-filled tank showed the highest heat loss rates, with a maximum of 9.914 W. • The PCM tank maintained higher temperatures for a longer duration. Thermal energy storage systems are vital to overcome the mismatch between the solar energy harvesting and demand employing several sensible and latent heat storage materials. This work experimentally evaluates the thermal performance of thermal energy storage tanks filled with gravel, phase change material (PCM), and water. Each tank was provided with 29 circumferential fins, and blanketed with a thermal insulation to minimize heat losses. The average temperature variation during heat charging and discharging and the energy stored for each tank was discussed and evaluated to specify the best storage medium. Findings indicated that the PCM tank displayed the best performance, exhibiting lowest heat loss rates during energy discharging, with values of 6.184, 6.505, 5.998, 8.221, and 9.388 W during peak 5 h. Meanwhile, the water tank showed heat losses of 8.599, 8.866, 9.121, 9.400, and 9.295 while, the gravel tank disclosed 9.496, 9.535, 9.802, 12.364, and 9.914 W, indicating poorer thermal performance. Study outcomes revealed that the PCM tank stored higher thermal energy compared with the other tanks, reaching a maximum of 0.87 kWh. Besides, the water tank stored 0.37 kWh thermal energy due to its high thermal capacity, while the gravel tank stored as lowest energy as 0.1 kWh. Equivalently, the PCM tank has stored 135 % and 770 % more energy than the water and gravel tanks, respectively. In conclusion, the PCM tank maintained higher temperatures and energy storage for a longer duration than other tanks, demonstrating high potential of PCM as an effective energy storage option.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105041
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Phase Change Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental study of solar thermal energy storage finned tanks filled with different storage materials (PCM, gravel, and water)

Ahmed K. Alshara, Waleed Khalaf Jabbar, Asiem Sahib Allawy
11 citations
Results in Engineering
Phase Change Materials Research
7.85
article

Experimental study of solar thermal energy storage finned tanks filled with different storage materials (PCM, gravel, and water)

Ahmed K. Alshara, Waleed Khalaf Jabbar, Asiem Sahib Allawy
article en
11 citations

Abstract

• The thermal performance of TES units filled with various materials is assessed experimentally. • The storage capacity of gravel and PCM are compared with water. • PCM-filled tank exposed best performance over other tanks. • The gravel-filled tank showed the highest heat loss rates, with a maximum of 9.914 W. • The PCM tank maintained higher temperatures for a longer duration. Thermal energy storage systems are vital to overcome the mismatch between the solar energy harvesting and demand employing several sensible and latent heat storage materials. This work experimentally evaluates the thermal performance of thermal energy storage tanks filled with gravel, phase change material (PCM), and water. Each tank was provided with 29 circumferential fins, and blanketed with a thermal insulation to minimize heat losses. The average temperature variation during heat charging and discharging and the energy stored for each tank was discussed and evaluated to specify the best storage medium. Findings indicated that the PCM tank displayed the best performance, exhibiting lowest heat loss rates during energy discharging, with values of 6.184, 6.505, 5.998, 8.221, and 9.388 W during peak 5 h. Meanwhile, the water tank showed heat losses of 8.599, 8.866, 9.121, 9.400, and 9.295 while, the gravel tank disclosed 9.496, 9.535, 9.802, 12.364, and 9.914 W, indicating poorer thermal performance. Study outcomes revealed that the PCM tank stored higher thermal energy compared with the other tanks, reaching a maximum of 0.87 kWh. Besides, the water tank stored 0.37 kWh thermal energy due to its high thermal capacity, while the gravel tank stored as lowest energy as 0.1 kWh. Equivalently, the PCM tank has stored 135 % and 770 % more energy than the water and gravel tanks, respectively. In conclusion, the PCM tank maintained higher temperatures and energy storage for a longer duration than other tanks, demonstrating high potential of PCM as an effective energy storage option.

Results in EngineeringVol. 26
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Phase Change Materials Research
7.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.