Comparing the National Early Warning Score and the Manchester Triage System in Emergency Department Triage: A Multi-Outcome Performance Evaluation

<b>Background:</b> Emergency department (ED) triage systems aim to prioritize patients based on clinical severity, ensuring timely intervention for high-risk cases. Recently, the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) has been proposed as an alternative to traditional triage systems, but its efficacy across multiple clinical outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the predictive performance of the NEWS and the Manchester Triage System (MTS) across multiple clinical outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective, single-center study at Merano Hospital, Italy, from 1 June 2022 to 30 June 2023, comparing the performance of the NEWS and the Manchester Triage System (MTS). All adult ED patients (≥18 years) were included, while exclusions applied to those on fast-track pathways, non-residents, and pregnant patients. Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality, hospitalization, and ICU admission. A random 5% subgroup was analyzed for secondary outcomes, including the need for life-saving interventions (LSIs), physician-defined clinical priority, and severity. Predictive performance was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the ROC curve (AUROC) comparisons, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). <b>Results:</b> Among 27,238 patients, the NEWS predicted 30-day mortality more accurately than the MTS (AUROC 0.745 vs. 0.701, <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, the MTS outperformed the NEWS for hospitalization (AUROC 0.733 vs. 0.609, <i>p</i> < 0.001), ICU admission (AUROC 0.862 vs. 0.672, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and all secondary outcomes. DCA further confirmed MTS's superiority across clinically relevant ED probability thresholds (20-40%). <b>Conclusions:</b> The NEWS, while effective for predicting mortality, it is inadequate in comprehensive triage decision-making. The MTS remains the superior system for prioritizing high-risk patients based on clinical severity. Rather than replacing triage with the NEWS, efforts should focus on refining existing systems to improve risk stratification. Future multi-center prospective studies are necessary to validate these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15091055
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the National Early Warning Score and the Manchester Triage System in Emergency Department Triage: A Multi-Outcome Performance Evaluation

Francesco Brigo, Serena Sibilio, Arian Zaboli, Gloria Brigiari et al.
2 citations
Diagnostics
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
4.51
article

Comparing the National Early Warning Score and the Manchester Triage System in Emergency Department Triage: A Multi-Outcome Performance Evaluation

Francesco Brigo, Serena Sibilio, Arian Zaboli, Gloria Brigiari, Magdalena Massar, Gianni Turcato, Norbert Pfeifer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Emergency department (ED) triage systems aim to prioritize patients based on clinical severity, ensuring timely intervention for high-risk cases. Recently, the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) has been proposed as an alternative to traditional triage systems, but its efficacy across multiple clinical outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the predictive performance of the NEWS and the Manchester Triage System (MTS) across multiple clinical outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective, single-center study at Merano Hospital, Italy, from 1 June 2022 to 30 June 2023, comparing the performance of the NEWS and the Manchester Triage System (MTS). All adult ED patients (≥18 years) were included, while exclusions applied to those on fast-track pathways, non-residents, and pregnant patients. Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality, hospitalization, and ICU admission. A random 5% subgroup was analyzed for secondary outcomes, including the need for life-saving interventions (LSIs), physician-defined clinical priority, and severity. Predictive performance was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the ROC curve (AUROC) comparisons, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). <b>Results:</b> Among 27,238 patients, the NEWS predicted 30-day mortality more accurately than the MTS (AUROC 0.745 vs. 0.701, <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, the MTS outperformed the NEWS for hospitalization (AUROC 0.733 vs. 0.609, <i>p</i> < 0.001), ICU admission (AUROC 0.862 vs. 0.672, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and all secondary outcomes. DCA further confirmed MTS's superiority across clinically relevant ED probability thresholds (20-40%). <b>Conclusions:</b> The NEWS, while effective for predicting mortality, it is inadequate in comprehensive triage decision-making. The MTS remains the superior system for prioritizing high-risk patients based on clinical severity. Rather than replacing triage with the NEWS, efforts should focus on refining existing systems to improve risk stratification. Future multi-center prospective studies are necessary to validate these findings.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(9)
University of Padua (IT), University of Basel (CH), Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences (IT), Krankenhaus Meran (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
4.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.