Gender, Self-Efficacy, and Academic Performance: Evidence in Business Education Program

Self-efficacy, the conviction in one's ability to succeed in particular tasks, is crucial in academic performance and professional development, especially in higher education programs. Although it has been widely studied in STEM disciplines, research on gender differences in self-efficacy in business education is scarce, especially in the Chilean context. This study aims to fill this gap by examining self-efficacy beliefs and their association with academic performance among business students at a Chilean university. Using a quantitative, cross-sectional design, data were collected from 239 students via the validated Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (ESAA). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the scale's psychometric robustness in measuring situational and personal efficacy beliefs. No significant associations were found between self-efficacy and academic performance. However, gender differences emerged in personal efficacy beliefs, with men reporting higher levels than women, while no differences were found in situational efficacy. These findings reinforce the multidimensional nature of academic self-efficacy and reveal persistent gender disparities in how students perceive their individual academic capacities. This asymmetry may limit women's engagement, confidence, and long-term professional development in male-dominated fields such as business. The results point to the need for gender-sensitive educational strategies that intentionally foster personal efficacy beliefs among female students, thereby promoting more equitable academic experiences and professional trajectories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050563
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender, Self-Efficacy, and Academic Performance: Evidence in Business Education Program

Ana Moraga, Sonia Ilse Salvo-Garrido, Vesnia Ortiz-Cea
8 citations
Behavioral Sciences
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
16.95
article

Gender, Self-Efficacy, and Academic Performance: Evidence in Business Education Program

Ana Moraga, Sonia Ilse Salvo-Garrido, Vesnia Ortiz-Cea
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Self-efficacy, the conviction in one's ability to succeed in particular tasks, is crucial in academic performance and professional development, especially in higher education programs. Although it has been widely studied in STEM disciplines, research on gender differences in self-efficacy in business education is scarce, especially in the Chilean context. This study aims to fill this gap by examining self-efficacy beliefs and their association with academic performance among business students at a Chilean university. Using a quantitative, cross-sectional design, data were collected from 239 students via the validated Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (ESAA). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the scale's psychometric robustness in measuring situational and personal efficacy beliefs. No significant associations were found between self-efficacy and academic performance. However, gender differences emerged in personal efficacy beliefs, with men reporting higher levels than women, while no differences were found in situational efficacy. These findings reinforce the multidimensional nature of academic self-efficacy and reveal persistent gender disparities in how students perceive their individual academic capacities. This asymmetry may limit women's engagement, confidence, and long-term professional development in male-dominated fields such as business. The results point to the need for gender-sensitive educational strategies that intentionally foster personal efficacy beliefs among female students, thereby promoting more equitable academic experiences and professional trajectories.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 15(5)
Universidad de La Frontera (CL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
16.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.