Microvascular Anastomosis in Practice: A Pilot Study on Microsurgical Training Efficiency

<b>Background:</b> Microsurgery is a demanding surgical field requiring precision and extensive training. There is a continued need for standardized training models to improve skill acquisition and efficiency in microvascular anastomosis. <b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to assess whether a standardized microsurgery training protocol, focusing on technique-specific objectives, improves performance among beginner trainees. <b>Material and Methods:</b> A three-month, non-randomized cohort study was conducted with entry-level plastic surgery residents. Participants were assigned to either a control group, practicing without structured guidance, or a test group, using a predefined microsurgery curriculum. Skill performance was measured at baseline, three weeks, and three months using a modified University of Western Ontario Microsurgical Skills Assessment (UWOMSA) tool. <b>Results:</b> While both groups improved over time, the test group demonstrated significantly greater improvement at the three-month mark (mean score: 59 vs. 38; <i>p</i> = 0.00027). The structured training model promoted more consistent progress and superior microsurgical technique. <b>Conclusions:</b> A standardized training protocol significantly enhances microsurgical proficiency over time. These findings suggest value in structured, low-cost training models for microsurgical education. Limitations include the small sample size, use of non-living models, and a non-randomized design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinics and Practice
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15050082
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microvascular Anastomosis in Practice: A Pilot Study on Microsurgical Training Efficiency

Ioan Lascăr, Andreea Grosu-Bularda, Cristian-Sorin Hariga, Andrei Cretu et al.
1 citations
Clinics and Practice
Surgical Simulation and Training
2.01
article

Microvascular Anastomosis in Practice: A Pilot Study on Microsurgical Training Efficiency

Ioan Lascăr, Andreea Grosu-Bularda, Cristian-Sorin Hariga, Andrei Cretu, Eliza-Maria Bordeanu-Diaconescu, Vladut-Alin Ratoiu, Cătălina-Ştefania Dumitru, Florin-Vlad Hodea, Raducu-Andrei Costache, Razvan-Nicolae Teodoreanu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Microsurgery is a demanding surgical field requiring precision and extensive training. There is a continued need for standardized training models to improve skill acquisition and efficiency in microvascular anastomosis. <b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to assess whether a standardized microsurgery training protocol, focusing on technique-specific objectives, improves performance among beginner trainees. <b>Material and Methods:</b> A three-month, non-randomized cohort study was conducted with entry-level plastic surgery residents. Participants were assigned to either a control group, practicing without structured guidance, or a test group, using a predefined microsurgery curriculum. Skill performance was measured at baseline, three weeks, and three months using a modified University of Western Ontario Microsurgical Skills Assessment (UWOMSA) tool. <b>Results:</b> While both groups improved over time, the test group demonstrated significantly greater improvement at the three-month mark (mean score: 59 vs. 38; <i>p</i> = 0.00027). The structured training model promoted more consistent progress and superior microsurgical technique. <b>Conclusions:</b> A standardized training protocol significantly enhances microsurgical proficiency over time. These findings suggest value in structured, low-cost training models for microsurgical education. Limitations include the small sample size, use of non-living models, and a non-randomized design.

Clinics and PracticeVol. 15(5)
Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Surgical Simulation and Training
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.