Associations between CAHPS scores of patient care experiences and breast cancer survival among senior female survivors:a SEER-CAHPS analysis

This study examined potential disparities in Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) scores of patient care experiences among racial/ethnic minority survivors and breast cancer-specific mortality. Female breast cancer survivors who completed a CAHPS survey between 2000 and 2019 after being diagnosed with first primary invasive breast cancer were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-CAHPS data linkage. Adjusted Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards models were used to determine associations of CAHPS scores of patient care experiences with breast cancer-specific mortality, overall and stratified by race/ethnicity. Most survivors were NHW women (80.4 percent). Adjusted associations between CAHPS scores and breast cancer mortality were not significant. However, Hispanic survivors reporting higher Physician Rating scores were less likely to experience breast cancer death (HR = 0.985, 95 percent CI = 0.970-1.000, <i>p</i> = .046). The only interaction found to be significant was observed among other/multi-racial groups and Getting Care Quickly (<i>p</i> = .044). Patient care experience scores were not associated with breast cancer-specific mortality among older breast cancer survivors; some associations were found to be significant among certain racial/ethnic groups. Future research should capture care experiences from historically underrepresented populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Women & Health
Published
2025-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2025.2489511
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations between CAHPS scores of patient care experiences and breast cancer survival among senior female survivors:a SEER-CAHPS analysis

Kate E. Dibble, Avonne E. Connor, Zhengyi Deng, Mu Jin
1 links
Women & Health
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Associations between CAHPS scores of patient care experiences and breast cancer survival among senior female survivors:a SEER-CAHPS analysis

Kate E. Dibble, Avonne E. Connor, Zhengyi Deng, Mu Jin
article en

Abstract

This study examined potential disparities in Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) scores of patient care experiences among racial/ethnic minority survivors and breast cancer-specific mortality. Female breast cancer survivors who completed a CAHPS survey between 2000 and 2019 after being diagnosed with first primary invasive breast cancer were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-CAHPS data linkage. Adjusted Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards models were used to determine associations of CAHPS scores of patient care experiences with breast cancer-specific mortality, overall and stratified by race/ethnicity. Most survivors were NHW women (80.4 percent). Adjusted associations between CAHPS scores and breast cancer mortality were not significant. However, Hispanic survivors reporting higher Physician Rating scores were less likely to experience breast cancer death (HR = 0.985, 95 percent CI = 0.970-1.000, <i>p</i> = .046). The only interaction found to be significant was observed among other/multi-racial groups and Getting Care Quickly (<i>p</i> = .044). Patient care experience scores were not associated with breast cancer-specific mortality among older breast cancer survivors; some associations were found to be significant among certain racial/ethnic groups. Future research should capture care experiences from historically underrepresented populations.

Women & HealthVol. 65(4)
Harvard University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Stanford Medicine (US), Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (US), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
National Cancer Institute
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.