Determination of High‐Temperature Float Charge Failure Mechanisms in Lithium‐Ion Batteries by Quantifying Active Lithium Loss

ABSTRACT Lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) suffer from float charge failure in the grid‐scale storage market. However, the lack of a unified descriptor for the diverse reasons behind float charge failure poses a challenge. Here, a quantitative analysis of active lithium loss is conducted across multiple temperatures into float charge of Li(Ni 0.5 Co 0.2 Mn 0.3 )O 2 –graphite batteries. It is proposed that the active lithium loss can be used as a descriptor to describe the reasons for float charge quantitatively. Approximately 6.88% and 0.96% of active lithium are lost due to solid electrolyte interphase thickening and lithium deposition, which are primary and secondary failure reasons, respectively. These findings are confirmed by X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy depth profiling, scanning electron microscope, and accelerating rate calorimeter. Titration‐gas chromatography and nuclear magnetic resonance are utilized to quantitatively analyze active lithium loss. Additionally, electrolyte decomposition at high temperatures also contributes to active lithium loss, as determined by Auger electron spectrum and nondestructive ultrasound measurements. Notably, no failure is detected in the cathode due to the relatively low working voltage of the float charge. These findings suggest that inhibiting active lithium loss can be an efficient way of delaying failure during high‐temperature float charge processes in LIBs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carbon Energy
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cey2.70002
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Advancements in Battery Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determination of High‐Temperature Float Charge Failure Mechanisms in Lithium‐Ion Batteries by Quantifying Active Lithium Loss

Huifang Di, Fangyuan Su, Ya‐Lu Han, Cheng‐Meng Chen et al.
4 citations
Carbon Energy
Advancements in Battery Materials
2.92
article

Determination of High‐Temperature Float Charge Failure Mechanisms in Lithium‐Ion Batteries by Quantifying Active Lithium Loss

Huifang Di, Fangyuan Su, Ya‐Lu Han, Cheng‐Meng Chen, Jingpeng Chen, Zonglin Yi, Hao Wang, Xiaoming Li, Lijing Xie
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) suffer from float charge failure in the grid‐scale storage market. However, the lack of a unified descriptor for the diverse reasons behind float charge failure poses a challenge. Here, a quantitative analysis of active lithium loss is conducted across multiple temperatures into float charge of Li(Ni 0.5 Co 0.2 Mn 0.3 )O 2 –graphite batteries. It is proposed that the active lithium loss can be used as a descriptor to describe the reasons for float charge quantitatively. Approximately 6.88% and 0.96% of active lithium are lost due to solid electrolyte interphase thickening and lithium deposition, which are primary and secondary failure reasons, respectively. These findings are confirmed by X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy depth profiling, scanning electron microscope, and accelerating rate calorimeter. Titration‐gas chromatography and nuclear magnetic resonance are utilized to quantitatively analyze active lithium loss. Additionally, electrolyte decomposition at high temperatures also contributes to active lithium loss, as determined by Auger electron spectrum and nondestructive ultrasound measurements. Notably, no failure is detected in the cathode due to the relatively low working voltage of the float charge. These findings suggest that inhibiting active lithium loss can be an efficient way of delaying failure during high‐temperature float charge processes in LIBs.

Carbon EnergyVol. 7(7)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Coal Chemistry (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Advancements in Battery Materials
2.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.