Who Is the Caregiver in Kant’s Theory of Labour? Examining Social Domination in Classical German Philosophy

Abstract This article addresses Kant’s account of domestic labour from the standpoint of social philosophy. First, I examine the case of the domestic household servant as a paradigm of the legal legitimation of social domination in Kant’s legal philosophy. Second, I explore the intersectionality of gender, race, and class in the outsourcing of care tasks available to wealthy European women in Kant’s theory of labour. Third, I bring Kant’s theory into a critical dialogue with some contemporary challenges of a democratic and equal society. Finally, I draw some conclusions about concrete forms of intersectional domination and exploitation underpinning Kant’s republicanism, before proposing that they are clearly inconsistent, insofar as they exclude large groups of people from the republican demos, even if they essentially contribute to its social reproduction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kantian Review
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415425000081
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Is the Caregiver in Kant’s Theory of Labour? Examining Social Domination in Classical German Philosophy

Núria Sánchez Madrid
1 citations
Kantian Review
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
17.27
article

Who Is the Caregiver in Kant’s Theory of Labour? Examining Social Domination in Classical German Philosophy

Núria Sánchez Madrid
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article addresses Kant’s account of domestic labour from the standpoint of social philosophy. First, I examine the case of the domestic household servant as a paradigm of the legal legitimation of social domination in Kant’s legal philosophy. Second, I explore the intersectionality of gender, race, and class in the outsourcing of care tasks available to wealthy European women in Kant’s theory of labour. Third, I bring Kant’s theory into a critical dialogue with some contemporary challenges of a democratic and equal society. Finally, I draw some conclusions about concrete forms of intersectional domination and exploitation underpinning Kant’s republicanism, before proposing that they are clearly inconsistent, insofar as they exclude large groups of people from the republican demos, even if they essentially contribute to its social reproduction.

Kantian ReviewVol. 30(3)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
17.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who Is the Caregiver in Kant’s Theory of Labour? Examining Social Domination in Classical German Philosophy — Núria Sánchez Madrid · Kantian Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS