The Influence of Various Tensile and Shear Reinforcement Configurations on the Ultimate Capacity and Failure Mechanisms of Reinforced Concrete Beams

This study comprehensively examines the impact of various tensile and shear reinforcement arrangements on the ultimate capacity and failure mode of reinforced concrete (RC) beams. This study encompasses theoretical, experimental, and numerical approaches. The experiment consisted of six beams (three 2.0 m long beams and three beams measuring 1 m in length) and had unique shear and tensile reinforcement setups. Truss bars and stirrups were used as shear reinforcement, while steel plates and bars were used as tensile reinforcement. The objective was to assess and compare the impact of the arrangement of tensile and shear reinforcement on the bending and shear strength of beams. The findings suggest that concrete beams reinforced with steel plates and stirrups had the highest load-carrying capacity when compared with conventional beams. Furthermore, a beam using truss bars with only 51.1% of the shear reinforcement area provided by stirrups achieved approximately 87% of the load capacity of its stirrup-reinforced counterpart. Additionally, increasing the yield strength of the steel plates from 420 MPa to 520 MPa enhanced beam stiffness and resulted in a 6% increase in ultimate load capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15091396
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Various Tensile and Shear Reinforcement Configurations on the Ultimate Capacity and Failure Mechanisms of Reinforced Concrete Beams

I.A. Sharaky, Fahad M. Alharthi, Mostafa M. A. Mostafa, Ahmed S. Elamary et al.
1 citations
Buildings
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
1.01
article

The Influence of Various Tensile and Shear Reinforcement Configurations on the Ultimate Capacity and Failure Mechanisms of Reinforced Concrete Beams

I.A. Sharaky, Fahad M. Alharthi, Mostafa M. A. Mostafa, Ahmed S. Elamary, Ayman El‐Zohairy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study comprehensively examines the impact of various tensile and shear reinforcement arrangements on the ultimate capacity and failure mode of reinforced concrete (RC) beams. This study encompasses theoretical, experimental, and numerical approaches. The experiment consisted of six beams (three 2.0 m long beams and three beams measuring 1 m in length) and had unique shear and tensile reinforcement setups. Truss bars and stirrups were used as shear reinforcement, while steel plates and bars were used as tensile reinforcement. The objective was to assess and compare the impact of the arrangement of tensile and shear reinforcement on the bending and shear strength of beams. The findings suggest that concrete beams reinforced with steel plates and stirrups had the highest load-carrying capacity when compared with conventional beams. Furthermore, a beam using truss bars with only 51.1% of the shear reinforcement area provided by stirrups achieved approximately 87% of the load capacity of its stirrup-reinforced counterpart. Additionally, increasing the yield strength of the steel plates from 420 MPa to 520 MPa enhanced beam stiffness and resulted in a 6% increase in ultimate load capacity.

BuildingsVol. 15(9)
Taif University (SA), Al-Azhar University (EG), East Texas A&M University (US)
Taif University
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.