Emotional impact according to the way cancer patients are conducted to the surgical center: A randomized clinical trial comparing ambulation to the stretcher

This study aimed to evaluate anxiety, depression and satisfaction of cancer patients according to the type of conduction to the surgical center. A randomized clinical trial was carried out at Barretos Cancer Hospital from 2019 to 2021. One hundred seventy-six patients were enrolled: 94 in the control group (conduction to the surgical center on a stretcher and pajamas) and 82 in the experimental group (conduction to the surgical center by ambulation in one's own clothes). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to assess the levels of anxiety and depression, and the Surgery Health Care Satisfaction Assessment Questionnaire (Sati-Cir) to assess the patient's satisfaction. There was no difference regarding anxiety and depression symptoms between groups, 15 (18.3%) and 20 (21.3%) patients had anxiety symptoms in the ambulation group and in the stretcher group, respectively (p = 0.621). Six (7.3%) patients in the ambulation group and 4 (4.3%) met the criteria for depression (p = 0.518). Compared to those who were referred to the surgical center on a stretcher, those in the ambulation group were more often satisfied or very satisfied according to the waiting time until surgery (91.5% vs 74.5%; p = 0.008) and type of clothing, own clothes compared to pajamas (100% vs 79%; p = 0.001). When all patients were asked about their preferred method of going to the surgical center, 70.5% chose to walk in their own clothes, 28.4% preferred a stretcher, and 1.1% opted for a wheelchair (p < 0.001). The transportation method to the surgical center did not affect anxiety and depression levels in cancer patients with no or low fall risk. However, patients in the ambulation group were more satisfied with the waiting time for surgery and the type of clothing. Clinical trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03576482, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03576482.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320856
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emotional impact according to the way cancer patients are conducted to the surgical center: A randomized clinical trial comparing ambulation to the stretcher

Paula Moreira da Silva Sabaini, Thiago Emilio da Silva Mantovani, Marcos Alves de Lima, Ricardo dos Reis et al.
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Cancer survivorship and care
1.05
article

Emotional impact according to the way cancer patients are conducted to the surgical center: A randomized clinical trial comparing ambulation to the stretcher

Paula Moreira da Silva Sabaini, Thiago Emilio da Silva Mantovani, Marcos Alves de Lima, Ricardo dos Reis, Priscila Grecca Pedrão, Gabriela Oliveira, Vinícius de Paula Silva, Carlos Eduardo Mattos da Cunha Andrade
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate anxiety, depression and satisfaction of cancer patients according to the type of conduction to the surgical center. A randomized clinical trial was carried out at Barretos Cancer Hospital from 2019 to 2021. One hundred seventy-six patients were enrolled: 94 in the control group (conduction to the surgical center on a stretcher and pajamas) and 82 in the experimental group (conduction to the surgical center by ambulation in one's own clothes). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to assess the levels of anxiety and depression, and the Surgery Health Care Satisfaction Assessment Questionnaire (Sati-Cir) to assess the patient's satisfaction. There was no difference regarding anxiety and depression symptoms between groups, 15 (18.3%) and 20 (21.3%) patients had anxiety symptoms in the ambulation group and in the stretcher group, respectively (p = 0.621). Six (7.3%) patients in the ambulation group and 4 (4.3%) met the criteria for depression (p = 0.518). Compared to those who were referred to the surgical center on a stretcher, those in the ambulation group were more often satisfied or very satisfied according to the waiting time until surgery (91.5% vs 74.5%; p = 0.008) and type of clothing, own clothes compared to pajamas (100% vs 79%; p = 0.001). When all patients were asked about their preferred method of going to the surgical center, 70.5% chose to walk in their own clothes, 28.4% preferred a stretcher, and 1.1% opted for a wheelchair (p < 0.001). The transportation method to the surgical center did not affect anxiety and depression levels in cancer patients with no or low fall risk. However, patients in the ambulation group were more satisfied with the waiting time for surgery and the type of clothing. Clinical trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03576482, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03576482.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(4)
Hospital de Câncer de Barretos (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Cancer survivorship and care
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.