Comparative Phylogenetic Study on Host Newts (Caudata: Salamandridae) and Parasitic Mites (Acariformes: Hydrachnidia: Hygrobatidae) in East and Southeast Asia

The water mite genus <i>Hygrobates</i> and the newt family Salamandridae are distributed widely in the northern hemisphere. However, only in Eastern and Southeastern Asia a host-parasite association developed, with several <i>Hygrobates</i> species, which belong to the subgenus <i>Lurchibates</i>, parasitizing newts of the genera <i>Laotriton</i>, <i>Pachytriton</i>, and <i>Paramesotriton</i>. Presently, there is no molecular study on parasitic <i>Hygrobates</i>, which impedes our understanding of their phylogeny and the evolutionary history of the host-parasite association between <i>Lurchibates</i> and their hosts. In this study, we performed comparative phylogenetic analyses on parasitic <i>Lurchibates</i> mites and their newt hosts based on their respective phylogenies. Our results did not support the monophyly of parasitic species of <i>Hygrobates</i>, but instead, group them significantly with a free-living species, <i>H. longiporus</i>. Among the parasitic species, <i>H. forcipifer</i>, <i>H. macrochela</i>, <i>H. malosimilis</i>, and <i>H. robustipalpis</i> are significantly grouped together, while branching patterns of the remaining species were not supported. Distance-based approaches of cophylogeny analysis between hosts and parasites found no significant link. On the other hand, among all the cost schemes constructed by event-based cophylogeny methods, four cospeciation events, two duplication and host-switching events, one loss event, and two failure to diverge events between parasitic water mites and newts were discovered. Our findings suggested that host switching events might have played an important role in the evolution of these parasitic mites, which might have led to incompletely exclusive host-parasitic relationships at species level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2108/zs240074
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Study of Mite Species
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Phylogenetic Study on Host Newts (Caudata: Salamandridae) and Parasitic Mites (Acariformes: Hydrachnidia: Hygrobatidae) in East and Southeast Asia

Yanpeng Shen, Kanto Nishikawa, Tom Goldschmidt, Satoshi Shimano et al.
1 citations
ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Study of Mite Species
3.03
article

Comparative Phylogenetic Study on Host Newts (Caudata: Salamandridae) and Parasitic Mites (Acariformes: Hydrachnidia: Hygrobatidae) in East and Southeast Asia

Yanpeng Shen, Kanto Nishikawa, Tom Goldschmidt, Satoshi Shimano, Daosavanh Sanamxay, Nguyen Thien Tao, Shimpei F. Hiruta, Anthony Lau, Jian-Ping Jiang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The water mite genus <i>Hygrobates</i> and the newt family Salamandridae are distributed widely in the northern hemisphere. However, only in Eastern and Southeastern Asia a host-parasite association developed, with several <i>Hygrobates</i> species, which belong to the subgenus <i>Lurchibates</i>, parasitizing newts of the genera <i>Laotriton</i>, <i>Pachytriton</i>, and <i>Paramesotriton</i>. Presently, there is no molecular study on parasitic <i>Hygrobates</i>, which impedes our understanding of their phylogeny and the evolutionary history of the host-parasite association between <i>Lurchibates</i> and their hosts. In this study, we performed comparative phylogenetic analyses on parasitic <i>Lurchibates</i> mites and their newt hosts based on their respective phylogenies. Our results did not support the monophyly of parasitic species of <i>Hygrobates</i>, but instead, group them significantly with a free-living species, <i>H. longiporus</i>. Among the parasitic species, <i>H. forcipifer</i>, <i>H. macrochela</i>, <i>H. malosimilis</i>, and <i>H. robustipalpis</i> are significantly grouped together, while branching patterns of the remaining species were not supported. Distance-based approaches of cophylogeny analysis between hosts and parasites found no significant link. On the other hand, among all the cost schemes constructed by event-based cophylogeny methods, four cospeciation events, two duplication and host-switching events, one loss event, and two failure to diverge events between parasitic water mites and newts were discovered. Our findings suggested that host switching events might have played an important role in the evolution of these parasitic mites, which might have led to incompletely exclusive host-parasitic relationships at species level.

ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCEVol. 42(3)
SHOWA Medical University (JP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Hosei University (JP), Hainan University (CN), Kyoto University (JP), Mount Fuji Research Institute (JP), Bavarian State Collection of Zoology (DE), Chengdu Institute of Biology (CN), National University of Laos (LA), Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VN)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Study of Mite Species
3.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.