Conflict and Factionalism in Peace Movements

Social movements in the United States are carried by broad coalitions of organizations with different goals, methods, and constituencies. Factionalism and conflict are inevitable, and effective movements must find ways to manage rivalries and conflict. The history of the peace movement reveals conflicts among organizations operating with some shared purposes, sometimes precipitated by internal factors, and sometimes precipitated by external shocks. Groups compete for resources, including attention, but must find ways to cooperate on matters of policy. Effective organizers must focus on managing the consequences of conflict rather than ending conflicts, keeping in mind common purposes and tolerating a diversity of approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Behavioral Scientist
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642251332252
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conflict and Factionalism in Peace Movements

Kelsy Kretschmer
American Behavioral Scientist
Political Conflict and Governance
article

Conflict and Factionalism in Peace Movements

Kelsy Kretschmer
article en

Abstract

Social movements in the United States are carried by broad coalitions of organizations with different goals, methods, and constituencies. Factionalism and conflict are inevitable, and effective movements must find ways to manage rivalries and conflict. The history of the peace movement reveals conflicts among organizations operating with some shared purposes, sometimes precipitated by internal factors, and sometimes precipitated by external shocks. Groups compete for resources, including attention, but must find ways to cooperate on matters of policy. Effective organizers must focus on managing the consequences of conflict rather than ending conflicts, keeping in mind common purposes and tolerating a diversity of approaches.

American Behavioral Scientist
Oregon State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.