PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA TERHADAP PERANTARA JUAL BELI NARKOTIKA GOLONGAN I

Without the right to be an intermediary for buying and selling narcotics is an act that is contrary to the law and is included in the deli formula as formulated in Article 8 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Thus, without the right to be an intermediary in the sale and purchase of narcotics as referred to in the South Jakarta District Decision Number 152/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Jkt.Sel., and Decision Number 207/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Jkt. Sel., namely a person who is not entitled to Class I narcotics or who uses them not for medical purposes, does not obtain a permit, and carries out buying and selling intermediaries against the law. This research will analyze the basic considerations of judges in deciding cases and criminal acts according to criminal law. This type of research is included in library research, so it takes and processes data from library sources such as books and journals related to this research. The approach used is normative legal research (normative juridical) or doctrinal research. The data collection method for this research is the documentation method, namely data collected from document sources written or created directly by the subject concerned. And the analysis used is content analysis technique, which is a technique used to analyze the content of written information with the aim of drawing conclusions from the analyzed information. This research shows that the judge's consideration in deciding the case was based on evidence and facts that had been revealed at the trial, the defendant committed a criminal act without the right to be an intermediary in buying and selling narcotics with an alternative charge, namely violating Article 114 paragraph (2) Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics and charged with the first count. Buying and selling narcotics means actions that are prohibited by law and from these actions the perpetrator of the crime will receive punishment because in this case the perpetrator committed a criminal act.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Hukum
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35315/dh.v26i1.10088
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA TERHADAP PERANTARA JUAL BELI NARKOTIKA GOLONGAN I

Choirur Rifai, Waty Suwarty Haryono, Uyan Wiryadi
1 citations
Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Hukum
Legal Studies and Policies
15.98
article

PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA TERHADAP PERANTARA JUAL BELI NARKOTIKA GOLONGAN I

Choirur Rifai, Waty Suwarty Haryono, Uyan Wiryadi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Without the right to be an intermediary for buying and selling narcotics is an act that is contrary to the law and is included in the deli formula as formulated in Article 8 of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Thus, without the right to be an intermediary in the sale and purchase of narcotics as referred to in the South Jakarta District Decision Number 152/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Jkt.Sel., and Decision Number 207/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Jkt. Sel., namely a person who is not entitled to Class I narcotics or who uses them not for medical purposes, does not obtain a permit, and carries out buying and selling intermediaries against the law. This research will analyze the basic considerations of judges in deciding cases and criminal acts according to criminal law. This type of research is included in library research, so it takes and processes data from library sources such as books and journals related to this research. The approach used is normative legal research (normative juridical) or doctrinal research. The data collection method for this research is the documentation method, namely data collected from document sources written or created directly by the subject concerned. And the analysis used is content analysis technique, which is a technique used to analyze the content of written information with the aim of drawing conclusions from the analyzed information. This research shows that the judge's consideration in deciding the case was based on evidence and facts that had been revealed at the trial, the defendant committed a criminal act without the right to be an intermediary in buying and selling narcotics with an alternative charge, namely violating Article 114 paragraph (2) Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics and charged with the first count. Buying and selling narcotics means actions that are prohibited by law and from these actions the perpetrator of the crime will receive punishment because in this case the perpetrator committed a criminal act.

Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika HukumVol. 26(1)
Universitas Krisnadwipayana (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Legal Studies and Policies
15.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.