Impact of Systemic Anticoagulation During Traumatic Peripheral Arterial Repair on Re-Intervention and Amputation: An Analysis of 11 Years of PROOVIT Data

IntroductionSystemic anticoagulation (SAC) is widely used during peripheral arterial repair (PAR) to mitigate thrombotic risks, but its efficacy in trauma patients remains unclear. This study evaluated the association of SAC with re-intervention and amputation rates in traumatic PAR.MethodsThis retrospective study queried the Prospective Observational Vascular Injury Treatment (PROOVIT) database (2012-2023) for traumatic PAR cases. Patients were grouped by SAC use during repair. Outcomes included re-intervention, amputation, thrombotic complications, packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion within 24 hours, and length of stay (LOS). Multivariable analysis adjusted for age, sex, injury mechanism, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and mangled extremity severity score (MESS).ResultsOf 1182 cases, 713 (60%) received SAC. Median age was 30 years, and 83.6% were male. In univariable analysis, amputation rates were similar between SAC (4.8%) and no-SAC (4.7%) groups (<i>P</i> = 0.970), as were thrombotic complications (4.8% vs 3.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.257). However, SAC was associated with higher re-intervention rates (14.4% vs 9.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.014), increased PRBC transfusion (median 2 vs 0 units, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and longer LOS (median 8 vs 5 days, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Multivariable analysis found no significant association between SAC and re-intervention (aOR 1.128, <i>P</i> = 0.643), or amputation (aOR 0.671, <i>P</i> = 0.200).ConclusionSAC during traumatic peripheral arterial repair did not reduce amputation rates and was associated with increased re-intervention. However, multivariable analysis revealed no significant difference in outcomes, suggesting SAC neither provides universal benefit nor introduces harm. These findings highlight the need for future research to identify specific trauma populations that may benefit from individualized SAC use.Level of EvidenceLevel III, Prognostic/Epidemiological.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Surgeon
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251337158
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Vascular Procedures and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Systemic Anticoagulation During Traumatic Peripheral Arterial Repair on Re-Intervention and Amputation: An Analysis of 11 Years of PROOVIT Data

Negar Nekooei, Kenji Inaba, Danielle Brabender, Justin Z. Wang et al.
1 citations
The American Surgeon
Vascular Procedures and Complications
1.52
article

Impact of Systemic Anticoagulation During Traumatic Peripheral Arterial Repair on Re-Intervention and Amputation: An Analysis of 11 Years of PROOVIT Data

Negar Nekooei, Kenji Inaba, Danielle Brabender, Justin Z. Wang, Ajay Prasad, Anaar Siletz, Kazuhide Matsushima, Matthew J. Martin, Joseph J. DuBose
article en
1 citations

Abstract

IntroductionSystemic anticoagulation (SAC) is widely used during peripheral arterial repair (PAR) to mitigate thrombotic risks, but its efficacy in trauma patients remains unclear. This study evaluated the association of SAC with re-intervention and amputation rates in traumatic PAR.MethodsThis retrospective study queried the Prospective Observational Vascular Injury Treatment (PROOVIT) database (2012-2023) for traumatic PAR cases. Patients were grouped by SAC use during repair. Outcomes included re-intervention, amputation, thrombotic complications, packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion within 24 hours, and length of stay (LOS). Multivariable analysis adjusted for age, sex, injury mechanism, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and mangled extremity severity score (MESS).ResultsOf 1182 cases, 713 (60%) received SAC. Median age was 30 years, and 83.6% were male. In univariable analysis, amputation rates were similar between SAC (4.8%) and no-SAC (4.7%) groups (<i>P</i> = 0.970), as were thrombotic complications (4.8% vs 3.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.257). However, SAC was associated with higher re-intervention rates (14.4% vs 9.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.014), increased PRBC transfusion (median 2 vs 0 units, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and longer LOS (median 8 vs 5 days, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Multivariable analysis found no significant association between SAC and re-intervention (aOR 1.128, <i>P</i> = 0.643), or amputation (aOR 0.671, <i>P</i> = 0.200).ConclusionSAC during traumatic peripheral arterial repair did not reduce amputation rates and was associated with increased re-intervention. However, multivariable analysis revealed no significant difference in outcomes, suggesting SAC neither provides universal benefit nor introduces harm. These findings highlight the need for future research to identify specific trauma populations that may benefit from individualized SAC use.Level of EvidenceLevel III, Prognostic/Epidemiological.

The American SurgeonVol. 91(10)
University of Southern California (US), Los Angeles Medical Center (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Vascular Procedures and Complications
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.