Measuring Healthcare Worker Stigma During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the issue of stigmatization both by and directed towards healthcare workers (HCWs), impacting affected individuals’ wellbeing. Appropriate measurement of stigmatization is critical to identify target points for interventions. In this review, we compiled quantitative measurement instruments (MIs) used to study COVID-19-related stigma within the healthcare sector, focusing on stigma both towards and among HCWs. Psychometric properties and coverage of stigma facets were examined. The k = 38 included studies utilized a total of n = 36 unique stigma MIs; n = 22 scales were adapted from other domains rather than newly developed or pre-existing MIs. Most studies lacked extensive reports of their psychometric properties. Interpersonal processes ( n = 35) and received stigma ( n = 27) were commonly assessed stigma facets. Despite the attention stigmatization has received, consistent use of rigorously validated MIs is lacking. Future research would benefit from a stronger focus on assessing the psychometric quality of stigma MIs. Furthermore, the complexity of stigma should be given greater consideration in its measurement. Researchers should ensure a good fit between the measurement goal and the stigma facet measured. The accurate assessment of stigmatization processes is crucial to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at mitigating stigmatization and improve public health outcomes in the long term.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000893
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Healthcare Worker Stigma During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Samuel Tomczyk, Marlene Muehlmann, Isabel Kuhlmann, Dafina Danqa
1 citations
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Employment and Welfare Studies
2.82
article

Measuring Healthcare Worker Stigma During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Samuel Tomczyk, Marlene Muehlmann, Isabel Kuhlmann, Dafina Danqa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the issue of stigmatization both by and directed towards healthcare workers (HCWs), impacting affected individuals’ wellbeing. Appropriate measurement of stigmatization is critical to identify target points for interventions. In this review, we compiled quantitative measurement instruments (MIs) used to study COVID-19-related stigma within the healthcare sector, focusing on stigma both towards and among HCWs. Psychometric properties and coverage of stigma facets were examined. The k = 38 included studies utilized a total of n = 36 unique stigma MIs; n = 22 scales were adapted from other domains rather than newly developed or pre-existing MIs. Most studies lacked extensive reports of their psychometric properties. Interpersonal processes ( n = 35) and received stigma ( n = 27) were commonly assessed stigma facets. Despite the attention stigmatization has received, consistent use of rigorously validated MIs is lacking. Future research would benefit from a stronger focus on assessing the psychometric quality of stigma MIs. Furthermore, the complexity of stigma should be given greater consideration in its measurement. Researchers should ensure a good fit between the measurement goal and the stigma facet measured. The accurate assessment of stigmatization processes is crucial to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at mitigating stigmatization and improve public health outcomes in the long term.

European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Universität Greifswald (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Employment and Welfare Studies
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.