Field evaluation of data assimilation of LAI and model-based optimization of irrigation scheduling of processing tomatoes

Abstract Climate change and public policies restricting freshwater use for agricultural irrigation are compelling farmers to maintain production with limited water. Advanced irrigation scheduling tools that combine data and computer simulations are needed to optimize water use and maximize crop productivity. Limited studies have evaluated the performance of data assimilation and model-based simulation optimization of irrigation scheduling under field conditions. The objective of this study was to evaluate model-based irrigation scheduling with and without assimilation of LAI in processing tomatoes. The treatments included two DSSAT CropGro-Tomato models. The treatments were T1 (TM0005 with LAI data assimilation), T2 (TM0030 with LAI data assimilation), and T3 (Control: TM0005 without LAI data assimilation). This study was conducted near Davis, California. Model performance was evaluated using applied water, soil water content, growth, yield, and fruit quality. Results showed no significant yield differences between treatments that assimilated LAI and the control. All the models accurately predicted LAI and yield within one standard deviation of measured values, suggesting that model-based optimization was effective with or without data assimilation. The framework reduced applied water by 26% compared to current irrigation recommendations for processing tomatoes. The average applied irrigation was 391 mm, compared to the recommended (533 to 762) mm. No significant differences in fruit quality were observed between the treatments. Overall, the model-based simulation-optimization irrigation scheduling approach maintained the desired yield and fruit quality while reducing water use. A well-calibrated crop model did not benefit from LAI data assimilation, implying that model-based irrigation scheduling could be easily implemented without the need for monitoring and additional computation costs of assimilating LAI during the season which also include labor and instrumentation costs. The model-based irrigation scheduling framework proposed in this study could be applied to other crops to help growers cope with limited water supplies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Irrigation Science
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-025-01021-0
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Field evaluation of data assimilation of LAI and model-based optimization of irrigation scheduling of processing tomatoes

Isaya Kisekka, Floyid Nicolas, Raphael Linker
1 citations
Irrigation Science
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
1.19
article

Field evaluation of data assimilation of LAI and model-based optimization of irrigation scheduling of processing tomatoes

Isaya Kisekka, Floyid Nicolas, Raphael Linker
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Climate change and public policies restricting freshwater use for agricultural irrigation are compelling farmers to maintain production with limited water. Advanced irrigation scheduling tools that combine data and computer simulations are needed to optimize water use and maximize crop productivity. Limited studies have evaluated the performance of data assimilation and model-based simulation optimization of irrigation scheduling under field conditions. The objective of this study was to evaluate model-based irrigation scheduling with and without assimilation of LAI in processing tomatoes. The treatments included two DSSAT CropGro-Tomato models. The treatments were T1 (TM0005 with LAI data assimilation), T2 (TM0030 with LAI data assimilation), and T3 (Control: TM0005 without LAI data assimilation). This study was conducted near Davis, California. Model performance was evaluated using applied water, soil water content, growth, yield, and fruit quality. Results showed no significant yield differences between treatments that assimilated LAI and the control. All the models accurately predicted LAI and yield within one standard deviation of measured values, suggesting that model-based optimization was effective with or without data assimilation. The framework reduced applied water by 26% compared to current irrigation recommendations for processing tomatoes. The average applied irrigation was 391 mm, compared to the recommended (533 to 762) mm. No significant differences in fruit quality were observed between the treatments. Overall, the model-based simulation-optimization irrigation scheduling approach maintained the desired yield and fruit quality while reducing water use. A well-calibrated crop model did not benefit from LAI data assimilation, implying that model-based irrigation scheduling could be easily implemented without the need for monitoring and additional computation costs of assimilating LAI during the season which also include labor and instrumentation costs. The model-based irrigation scheduling framework proposed in this study could be applied to other crops to help growers cope with limited water supplies.

Irrigation ScienceVol. 43(6)
Oregon State University (US), Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL), University of California, Davis (US)
United States - Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Fund, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.