Efficacy of Epidural Bupivacaine Versus Ropivacaine in Abdominal Hysterectomy Cases

Aim: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of epidural Ropivacaine with Bupivacaine for anesthesia in abdominal hysterectomy cases with respect to the onset of sensory and motor blockade, degree of motor block, duration of motor blockade, duration of sensory analgesia.Materials and Methods: After taking written informed consent, 60 patients aged between 18 to 60 years posted for elective abdominal hysterectomy surgeries were selected.They were randomly divided into 2 groups with 30 patients in each group.Study group R received 15 ml of 0.5% Ropivacaine (isobaric) by the epidural route.Study group B -received 15 ml of 0. 5% Bupivacaine (isobaric) by the epidural route. The onset of sensory blockade, the onset of motor blockade, highest level of sensory blockade, degree of motor block was evaluated. Results: There is no difference in the onset of sensory and motor block between 0.5% bupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine when administered through the epidural route. The duration of motor blockade in group R was significantly lower than the group B. Conclusion:It can be concluded that isobaric 0.5% Ropivacaine, when administered through the epidural route, provides adequate anaesthesia for abdominal hysterectomy surgeries and 0.5% Ropivacaine has a shorter duration of motor blockade when compared with 0.5% Bupivacaine.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21275/mr25418192947
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of Epidural Bupivacaine Versus Ropivacaine in Abdominal Hysterectomy Cases

Priyam Saikia, Karuna Kumar Das, Santosh Choudhary, Udipta Borah
2 links
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Efficacy of Epidural Bupivacaine Versus Ropivacaine in Abdominal Hysterectomy Cases

Priyam Saikia, Karuna Kumar Das, Santosh Choudhary, Udipta Borah
article en

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of epidural Ropivacaine with Bupivacaine for anesthesia in abdominal hysterectomy cases with respect to the onset of sensory and motor blockade, degree of motor block, duration of motor blockade, duration of sensory analgesia.Materials and Methods: After taking written informed consent, 60 patients aged between 18 to 60 years posted for elective abdominal hysterectomy surgeries were selected.They were randomly divided into 2 groups with 30 patients in each group.Study group R received 15 ml of 0.5% Ropivacaine (isobaric) by the epidural route.Study group B -received 15 ml of 0. 5% Bupivacaine (isobaric) by the epidural route. The onset of sensory blockade, the onset of motor blockade, highest level of sensory blockade, degree of motor block was evaluated. Results: There is no difference in the onset of sensory and motor block between 0.5% bupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine when administered through the epidural route. The duration of motor blockade in group R was significantly lower than the group B. Conclusion:It can be concluded that isobaric 0.5% Ropivacaine, when administered through the epidural route, provides adequate anaesthesia for abdominal hysterectomy surgeries and 0.5% Ropivacaine has a shorter duration of motor blockade when compared with 0.5% Bupivacaine.

International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)Vol. 14(4)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.