Validation of the Spanish version of the cerebellar cognitive-affective syndrome scale

<b>Objective:</b> To validate the Spanish version of the Cerebellar Cognitive-Affective Syndrome scale (CCAS-S), originally published in 2018, in patients with cerebellar ataxia and healthy subjects, as an adapted Spanish version based on normative data has not yet been published or validated. <b>Methods:</b> Spanish CCAS-S was -administered prospectively to 158 patients with cerebellar ataxia and 164 matched healthy subjects from -different regions of Spain. Discriminant validity and reliability were evaluated. A subgroup of 30 patients underwent detailed neuropsychological examinations to confirm the construct validity. The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and the Brief Ataxia Rating Scale (BARS) were used to assess motor performance. <b>Results:</b> This Spanish instrument demonstrates reliability and exhibits statistically significant differences in performance between patients and healthy subjects. Our analysis revealed lower values for specificity in detecting possible, probable, or definite CCAS compared to those reported in the US validation study when utilizing the original cutoff values. Upon application of the appropriate -correction factor for education, the specificity values approximated those reported for probable and definite CCAS diagnostics in the original investigation. <b>Conclusions:</b> The adapted Spanish CCAS-S has demonstrated validity and good reliability in this cohort. Discriminant validity was satisfactory for probable and definite CCAS when the correction for education was applied, and modified template and instructions have been developed. Further research is necessary to investigate the significance of the possible CCAS category, as diagnosed using the Spanish version, as well as to assess the performance of the corrected scale in other Spanish-speaking countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2488453
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Vestibular and auditory disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Spanish version of the cerebellar cognitive-affective syndrome scale

Astrid Adarmes‐Gómez, Jesús Pérez‐Pérez, María José Abenza Abildúa, Eva María Martínez Fernández et al.
3 citations
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
Vestibular and auditory disorders
2.53
article

Validation of the Spanish version of the cerebellar cognitive-affective syndrome scale

Astrid Adarmes‐Gómez, Jesús Pérez‐Pérez, María José Abenza Abildúa, Eva María Martínez Fernández, Jeremy D. Schmahmann, Daniel López Domínguez, Rocío Martínez-Regueiro, Carmen García‐Sánchez, Inmaculada Feria-Vilar, Laura Rojas-Bartolomé, Paula Pérez‐Torre, Berta Alemany‐Perna, Carmen Serrano, Idoia Rouco Axpe
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> To validate the Spanish version of the Cerebellar Cognitive-Affective Syndrome scale (CCAS-S), originally published in 2018, in patients with cerebellar ataxia and healthy subjects, as an adapted Spanish version based on normative data has not yet been published or validated. <b>Methods:</b> Spanish CCAS-S was -administered prospectively to 158 patients with cerebellar ataxia and 164 matched healthy subjects from -different regions of Spain. Discriminant validity and reliability were evaluated. A subgroup of 30 patients underwent detailed neuropsychological examinations to confirm the construct validity. The Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and the Brief Ataxia Rating Scale (BARS) were used to assess motor performance. <b>Results:</b> This Spanish instrument demonstrates reliability and exhibits statistically significant differences in performance between patients and healthy subjects. Our analysis revealed lower values for specificity in detecting possible, probable, or definite CCAS compared to those reported in the US validation study when utilizing the original cutoff values. Upon application of the appropriate -correction factor for education, the specificity values approximated those reported for probable and definite CCAS diagnostics in the original investigation. <b>Conclusions:</b> The adapted Spanish CCAS-S has demonstrated validity and good reliability in this cohort. Discriminant validity was satisfactory for probable and definite CCAS when the correction for education was applied, and modified template and instructions have been developed. Further research is necessary to investigate the significance of the possible CCAS category, as diagnosed using the Spanish version, as well as to assess the performance of the corrected scale in other Spanish-speaking countries.

The Clinical NeuropsychologistVol. 40(1)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Harvard University (US), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES), Hospital de Sant Pau (ES), Biomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases (ES), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena (ES), Hospital Santa Caterina (ES), Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (ES), Hospital de Cruces (ES), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (ES), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (ES), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (ES), Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía (ES), Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (ES), Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Vestibular and auditory disorders
2.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.