Health Coaching Enhanced Older Adults’ Self-Efficacy in Managing Their Chronic Diseases: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Although health coaching is a well-known self-management intervention for individuals with chronic diseases, the research on its effect on older adults is limited. A total of 414 older Hong Kong adults were randomly assigned to the intervention group, which received 12-week health coaching sessions, and the control group without intervention. Participants in the intervention group completed assessments at three time points (baseline, postintervention, and three-month follow-up), and those in the control group completed baseline and three-month follow-up assessments. Generalized estimating equations first revealed a significant improvement in self-efficacy and blood pressures among the intervention group participants, and such improvements were maintained at follow-up. In addition, the self-efficacy of the intervention group significantly increased while that of the control group significantly decreased from baseline to follow-up. Thus, the overall results demonstrate the effectiveness of the health coaching intervention in improving the self-efficacy of older adults in managing their chronic diseases and health risks.
Authors
- Eliza Lai‐Yi Wong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9983-6219)
- Frank Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4707-9361)
- Dannii Yuen-Lan Yeung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0548-0328)
- Eng‐Kiong Yeoh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1721-9450)
- Hera Leung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7634-5660)
- Edwin Ka Hung Chung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7267-6419)
- Fung Lin Elean Leung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6561-3017)
Institutions
- City University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Hong Kong Jockey Club (HK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Applied Gerontology
- Published
- 2025-04-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648251336537
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Diabetes Management and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.59