Evaluation of the bristle characteristics and effects of denture brushes on acrylic resin

Specific denture brushes were evaluated in regards to characteristics of the bristles (thickness, bristle ends, and deterioration) and their effects (mass variation, surface roughness, and gloss) on acrylic resin after simulated brushing periods of 3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 12 months (T3). For their effects on acrylic resin, specimens were randomly distributed (n = 13): BI: Bitufo; CB: Curaprox; PP: Prosthesisplus; CO: Condor; OB: Oral B; OF: Orafix; and Control: Curaprox 5460. The specific brushes CO and OF showed higher values for thickness (larger side) (T0 to T3) and OF (smaller side) (T0). Results for both sides of bristle-ends showed (T0 to T3) flat or slanted bristles, indicating unacceptability in 69.4% to 85.1% of bristles. Results related to degradation showed bristles with progressive flat or oblique wear over time. For mass loss in dentures, there was gain in mass from T1 to T3 and mass gain over time for OB (T2). For surface roughness, there were no significant differences between all factors (p>0.001). For gloss, OB (T1 and T3) showed higher values. It was concluded that there is a lack of standardization of the characteristic of specific denture brushes. Despite the progressive wear of the bristles over time, Curaprox, Próteseplus, Condor, Oral B, and Orafix can be indicated for routine hygiene of denture wearers since they were not able to damage the acrylic resin.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Scientiarum Health Sciences
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4025/actascihealthsci.v47i1.68071
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the bristle characteristics and effects of denture brushes on acrylic resin

Ana Emanuela Cisne de Lima, Cláudia Helena Silva‐Lovato, Ana Paula Macedo, Helena de Freitas Oliveira Paranhos et al.
Acta Scientiarum Health Sciences
Dental materials and restorations
article

Evaluation of the bristle characteristics and effects of denture brushes on acrylic resin

Ana Emanuela Cisne de Lima, Cláudia Helena Silva‐Lovato, Ana Paula Macedo, Helena de Freitas Oliveira Paranhos, Viviane de Cássia Oliveira, Carolina Noronha Ferraz de Arruda, Daniel Zuluaga Goyeneche
article en

Abstract

Specific denture brushes were evaluated in regards to characteristics of the bristles (thickness, bristle ends, and deterioration) and their effects (mass variation, surface roughness, and gloss) on acrylic resin after simulated brushing periods of 3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 12 months (T3). For their effects on acrylic resin, specimens were randomly distributed (n = 13): BI: Bitufo; CB: Curaprox; PP: Prosthesisplus; CO: Condor; OB: Oral B; OF: Orafix; and Control: Curaprox 5460. The specific brushes CO and OF showed higher values for thickness (larger side) (T0 to T3) and OF (smaller side) (T0). Results for both sides of bristle-ends showed (T0 to T3) flat or slanted bristles, indicating unacceptability in 69.4% to 85.1% of bristles. Results related to degradation showed bristles with progressive flat or oblique wear over time. For mass loss in dentures, there was gain in mass from T1 to T3 and mass gain over time for OB (T2). For surface roughness, there were no significant differences between all factors (p>0.001). For gloss, OB (T1 and T3) showed higher values. It was concluded that there is a lack of standardization of the characteristic of specific denture brushes. Despite the progressive wear of the bristles over time, Curaprox, Próteseplus, Condor, Oral B, and Orafix can be indicated for routine hygiene of denture wearers since they were not able to damage the acrylic resin.

Acta Scientiarum Health SciencesVol. 47
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.