Impact of COVID-19 on Surgical Procedural Utilization

Background This study examines the impact of COVID-19 infection waves on the healthcare utilization of elective procedures versus non-elective procedures. Methods Eligible encounters were classified into simple/elective (elective) and cancer/complex (non-elective) groups based on the ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes. Procedure-specific volumes were used to evaluate healthcare utilization. Results Compared with the non-elective cohort, the elective cohort showed a greater dip (93% and 58% of the baseline volumes in March and April 2020 vs. 70% and 18% respectively, p-value = 0.0001). Similar patterns were identified for each successive wave of the pandemic. Conclusions During each of the first four waves of the pandemic, elective procedure volumes both fell and recovered at higher relative rates when compared with non-elective procedure volumes. Throughout the pandemic, there was a trend toward less cancelation of both elective and non-elective procedures with each successive wave. Our findings characterize the pandemic as a cyclic disease that surgical specialties are learning to cope with over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.82772
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of COVID-19 on Surgical Procedural Utilization

Christopher Garnet DuCoin, Bilal Koussayer, Timothy Nehila, Salvatore Docimo
Cureus
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
article

Impact of COVID-19 on Surgical Procedural Utilization

Christopher Garnet DuCoin, Bilal Koussayer, Timothy Nehila, Salvatore Docimo
article en

Abstract

Background This study examines the impact of COVID-19 infection waves on the healthcare utilization of elective procedures versus non-elective procedures. Methods Eligible encounters were classified into simple/elective (elective) and cancer/complex (non-elective) groups based on the ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes. Procedure-specific volumes were used to evaluate healthcare utilization. Results Compared with the non-elective cohort, the elective cohort showed a greater dip (93% and 58% of the baseline volumes in March and April 2020 vs. 70% and 18% respectively, p-value = 0.0001). Similar patterns were identified for each successive wave of the pandemic. Conclusions During each of the first four waves of the pandemic, elective procedure volumes both fell and recovered at higher relative rates when compared with non-elective procedure volumes. Throughout the pandemic, there was a trend toward less cancelation of both elective and non-elective procedures with each successive wave. Our findings characterize the pandemic as a cyclic disease that surgical specialties are learning to cope with over time.

CureusVol. 17(4)
University of South Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.