Assessing the interchangeability of keratometry measurements from four biometric devices in intraocular lens power calculations: insights into the predictive accuracy of five modern IOL formulas

Our findings indicate that keratometry measurements from different biometric devices are not fully interchangeable. SS-OCT-based devices (IOLMaster 700 and CASIA2) provided superior consistency in refractive prediction accuracy. Therefore, clinicians should carefully select biometric device-formula combinations based on the specific measurement principles and desired refractive outcomes. Further research involving larger sample sizes, additional IOL types and biometric devices, as well as assessment of surgeon-related factors, is warranted to optimize refractive accuracy in cataract surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Ophthalmology
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04067-y
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the interchangeability of keratometry measurements from four biometric devices in intraocular lens power calculations: insights into the predictive accuracy of five modern IOL formulas

Fangyu Zhao, Jing Sun, Kai Wen, Xiteng Chen et al.
3 citations
BMC Ophthalmology
Corneal surgery and disorders
4.08
article

Assessing the interchangeability of keratometry measurements from four biometric devices in intraocular lens power calculations: insights into the predictive accuracy of five modern IOL formulas

Fangyu Zhao, Jing Sun, Kai Wen, Xiteng Chen, Fang Tian, Cheng Li, Shan Ma, Jun Yang, Xiaoyan Sun
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Our findings indicate that keratometry measurements from different biometric devices are not fully interchangeable. SS-OCT-based devices (IOLMaster 700 and CASIA2) provided superior consistency in refractive prediction accuracy. Therefore, clinicians should carefully select biometric device-formula combinations based on the specific measurement principles and desired refractive outcomes. Further research involving larger sample sizes, additional IOL types and biometric devices, as well as assessment of surgeon-related factors, is warranted to optimize refractive accuracy in cataract surgery.

BMC OphthalmologyVol. 25(1)
Yangzhou Polytechnic Institute (CN), Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital (CN), He Eye Hospital (CN), Tianjin Medical University (CN)
Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Corneal surgery and disorders
4.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing the interchangeability of keratometry measurements from four biometric devices in intraocular lens power calculations: insights into the predictive accuracy of five modern IOL formulas — Fangyu Zhao, Jing Sun, et al. · BMC Ophthalmology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS