Comparison of Text Classification Techniques in Fake News Detection in the Digital Information Age

A comparison of text classification techniques for detecting fake news in the digital information age has been discussed in this study, with a focus on the application of Deep Learning methods, specifically Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN). The increasing spread of fake news through digital platforms emphasizes the importance of developing effective methods for identifying inaccurate information. In this study, a news dataset was collected from various sources, and both models were applied for text classification analysis. The performance of the model was then measured based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The results showed that although both have their own advantages, better results in terms of processing speed and classification accuracy were found in CNN compared to RNN. These findings provide important insights for the development of more efficient and effective fake news detection systems in the digital age.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advances in Data and Information Systems
Published
2025-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59395/ijadis.v6i1.1365
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Text Classification Techniques in Fake News Detection in the Digital Information Age

Dimas Muhammad Ilham, Sri Mujiyono
International Journal of Advances in Data and Information Systems
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Comparison of Text Classification Techniques in Fake News Detection in the Digital Information Age

Dimas Muhammad Ilham, Sri Mujiyono
article en

Abstract

A comparison of text classification techniques for detecting fake news in the digital information age has been discussed in this study, with a focus on the application of Deep Learning methods, specifically Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN). The increasing spread of fake news through digital platforms emphasizes the importance of developing effective methods for identifying inaccurate information. In this study, a news dataset was collected from various sources, and both models were applied for text classification analysis. The performance of the model was then measured based on accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The results showed that although both have their own advantages, better results in terms of processing speed and classification accuracy were found in CNN compared to RNN. These findings provide important insights for the development of more efficient and effective fake news detection systems in the digital age.

International Journal of Advances in Data and Information SystemsVol. 6(1)
Universitas Ngurah Rai (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Text Classification Techniques in Fake News Detection in the Digital Information Age — Dimas Muhammad Ilham, Sri Mujiyono · International Journal of Advances in Data and Information Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS